Hey all,I have just cut the ad hoc *RC2* release for Airflow Providers
packages (Amazon provider only). This email is calling a vote on the
release,which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end
on April 26, 2023 22:00 PM UTC (according to shortened voting period
policy as accepted
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages were
just released.
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.0.0/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.0.0/
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
Amazon provider is excluded from this release and RC2 will follow.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif (binding)
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Jed Cunningham (binding)
5 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Hussein Awala
-
Vote is now closed.
based on feedback from issue testing
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/30803 amazon: 8.0.0rc1 is excluded
from this release.
I will cut rc2 for amazon provider
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:45 PM Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> our astronomer-providers and
+1 non binding
our astronomer-providers and astro-sdk DAG'S ran fine on the RC's.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:02 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:25 PM Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs.
> > 1.
+1 (binding), tested my changes, verified licences, checksum and
signatures, all looks good.
Le lun. 24 avr. 2023 à 16:08, Pankaj Koti
a écrit :
> +1 non-binding. We tested our asynchronous providers' DAGs for multiple
> providers.
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer,
+1 non-binding. We tested our asynchronous providers' DAGs for multiple
providers.
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023
+1 non-binding
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:07 PM Utkarsh Sharma
wrote:
> +1 (Non-binding) Tested with AstroSDK.
>
> Thanks,
> Utkarsh Sharma
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
> > Drums rolling .
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ephraim Anierobi <
> >
+1 non binding
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:25 PM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs.
> 1. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.0.0rc1/
> 2.
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/6.1.0rc1/
>
+1 (Non-binding) Tested with AstroSDK.
Thanks,
Utkarsh Sharma
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Drums rolling .
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ephraim Anierobi <
> ephraimanier...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey fellow Airflowers,
> >
> > I have cut Airflow
Drums rolling .
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ephraim Anierobi <
ephraimanier...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>
> I have cut Airflow 2.6.0rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
> which will last at least 72 hours, from Monday, April 24, 2023 at 8:16 am
> UTC
>
+1 non-binding
We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs.
1. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.0.0rc1/
2.
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/6.1.0rc1/
3. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/4.1.0rc1/
4.
I had a look and I liked what I saw for how we should integrate the new
user manager for getting and checking the access :).
But I think the AIP proposal is not bold enough when it comes to the user
management part. This is one big comment - we should simplify it even
further and cut more deeply.
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.6.0rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last at least 72 hours, from Monday, April 24, 2023 at 8:16 am
UTC
until Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:16 pm UTC
14 matches
Mail list logo
