Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 12, 2023

2023-11-13 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, sources. Looks like the fixes were also already well tested in https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35592 On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:43 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the RC2 wave Airflow Providers packages. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.3 from 2.7.3rc1

2023-11-13 Thread Pierre Jeambrun
+1 (binding), checksums, signatures and licenses look good. (also ran a few sample requests against breeze instance) Le lun. 13 nov. 2023 à 23:20, Hussein Awala a écrit : > +1 (binding) I tested it by triggering some dag runs and running other API > requests, and all looks good. > > On Tue, Nov

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.3 from 2.7.3rc1

2023-11-13 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding) I tested it by triggering some dag runs and running other API requests, and all looks good. On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:13 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Sorry for missing it for so long. > > +1 (binding). Checked licences, checksums, signatures, tested that it works > with latest airflow

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.3 from 2.7.3rc1

2023-11-13 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Sorry for missing it for so long. +1 (binding). Checked licences, checksums, signatures, tested that it works with latest airflow - following https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/blob/main/dev/test_python_client.py I also verified sources (finally). One of the things that we do as