+1 (binding)
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:44 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) I ran all the checks (signatures, licences, checksums, and
> sources) and tested my changes; all looked good.
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:16 PM Phani Kumar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Dec 2
+1 (binding) I ran all the checks (signatures, licences, checksums, and
sources) and tested my changes; all looked good.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:16 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, 16:10 Amogh Desai, wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding for providers apart from weavite
Hi All,
In my current division already Temporal is being used for some onboarding
workflow management, now there are a few data pipelines that will have few
ETL jobs hence I am thinking of using Airflow to schedule ETL jobs and
monitor. But to use airflow, it is required to provide a clear advantag
After an initial indentation problem in .asf.yaml it's not working as
expected. So let's see how resolving conversations will work for us.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:17 PM Amogh Desai
wrote:
> Wooho! Looking to see how this turns out for airflow 😃
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 1:35 PM, Jarek P
Wooho! Looking to see how this turns out for airflow 😃
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 1:35 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cs6mcvpn2lk9w2p4oz43t20z3fg5nl7l I just
> enabled "require conversation resolution" for our main/stable branches. We
I am aligning here with Pierre, but I am not against the idea of enabling
the pre commit ci application.
I’d rather have myself fix the issue as it sometimes also lets me have
second,third or multiple passes at my code which is up for review. This is
a personal choice where I feel that we are tryi
+1 non binding
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, 16:10 Amogh Desai, wrote:
> +1 non binding for providers apart from weavite
>
> Tested few dags around cncf provider mainly. Could not see any regressions.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 4:08 PM, Pankaj Singh
> wrote:
>
> > + 1 (non-binding)
>
+1 non binding for providers apart from weavite
Tested few dags around cncf provider mainly. Could not see any regressions.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 4:08 PM, Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wei Lee wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) for provi
+ 1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for providers other than Weavaite
>
> Tested our example DAGs with the following providers without encountering
> issues
>
> apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.15.0rc1
> apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==
I like the idea, but in practice auto fixable static checks are very
obvious to fix and doesn’t require much work.
On the other hand most of static failure are ‘real issues’ and not auto
fixable, for instance mypy, spelling, sphinx, db session usage etc…. (And
ruff fix is a little aggressive IMO r
+1 (non-binding) for providers other than Weavaite
Tested our example DAGs with the following providers without encountering issues
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.15.0rc1
apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==7.13.0rc1
apache-airflow-providers-google==10.13.1rc1
apache-airflow-providers-m
Need 2 binding (+1) to proceed on that one (and get RC2 for Waeviate)
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 6:48 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> We will get an rc2 for weaviate. Depending on how many other changes will
> be merged in the meantime I will either release ad-hoc for just weaviate
> (and potentially oth
I‘d also like to have auto-fixing included in CI. It is a classic pitfall and
all that can be automated does not need to be a manual burden.
Though I am not sure whether the plugin is able to use all the custom stuff as
we also depend during execution on the CI image and docker. Besides security
Hello everyone,
As discussed in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/cs6mcvpn2lk9w2p4oz43t20z3fg5nl7l I just
enabled "require conversation resolution" for our main/stable branches. We
have not used it in the past so it might not work as we think or we might
need to tweak something.
Generally speaking
14 matches
Mail list logo
