[RESULT][VOTE] AIP-61: Hybrid Execution

Hey folks! The voting for AIP-61: Hybrid Execution (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-61+Hybrid+Execution) was completed on February 06, 2024 PST, and I am happy announce the following voting result: *Binding (+8) Votes* Jens Scheffler Jarek Potiuk Amogh Desai Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Add the ability to report slack messages that don't meet code of conduct

I was trying on a rough POC but it looks like I need to deploy my application against a webserver on the internet. I also do not have the access to create a private channel on Airflow Slack. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:43 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Thank you, I will

Re: [VOTE] Add the ability to report slack messages that don't meet code of conduct

Thank you, I will try to work on some POC soon On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:47 PM Briana Okyere wrote: > Would love your help on this Amogh! > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:40 PM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > Let us try to summarise and see what the bot has to do. Summarising: > > 1. The bot should

Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as permanent solution

Love the vote from @Jed Cunningham here! On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:05 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > -0.5 >

Re: Idea for Discussion: custom TI dependencies

Hi all, Thanks a lot for the feedback and inputs. Greatly greatly appreciated! Let me try to answer the questions & share my findings one by one: To Daniel’s question: the two examples I shared earlier may not be super solid. I actually “made up” them, and the use case we are having in mind

Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as permanent solution

-0.5

Re: [VOTE] Add the ability to report slack messages that don't meet code of conduct

Would love your help on this Amogh! On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:40 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > Let us try to summarise and see what the bot has to do. Summarising: > 1. The bot should allow users to report issues - anonymously too (or maybe > an option) > 2. These issues should get redirected to an

Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as permanent solution

+1 (binding) On Tuesday, February 6, 2024, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > -1 > > On 6 February 2024 06:38:04 GMT, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > >-1, binding. > > > > > >Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On 5 Feb 2024, at 21:07, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) < > jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com.invalid> wrote: