I agree with the points made by Andrey here.
> End users use amazon provider and google provider, and do not use
common.sql and both of them have mandatory common.sql as dependency.
On the contrary, would it be better to remove common.sql as mandatory
dependencies for
providers that do not use
databricks provider is excluded from RC2
let the vote continue only for yandex provider
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 8:10 AM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> -1 (non-binding) for the Databricks provider. We would need to also include
> PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38962 for the included PRs in
>
I feel like this is the responsibility of the provider contributor 樂 Maybe we
could check whether the PR contains common.sql usage and raise a warning?
Best,
Wei
> On Apr 12, 2024, at 12:31 AM, Andrey Anshin wrote:
>
> There are some drawbacks I saw here, it would force to upgrade other
>
