Re: [DISCUSS] Asynchronous SQLAlchemy

2024-04-15 Thread Daniel Standish
One thought that occurred to me... In order to really take advantage of async python, it may essentially require a scheduler rewrite. Certainly there will be a lot of refactoring required. And I have not looked closely at this. But I think chances are good that there will be a lot of things that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Keep >= LATEST MINOR for all providers using common.sql provider

2024-04-15 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Thanks to everyone who spoke. Yeah. There are certain dangers of that approach. I think for now we have not seen much of a problem with the current approach, but we might want to address it differently - probably not by running a complete set of tests for older versions (that's not really feasible

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 13, 2024

2024-04-15 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums and licences. On Monday, April 15, 2024, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) for yandex: checked signatures, licences, checksums, > reproducibility. > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 2:51 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > databricks provider is excluded from RC2 > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 13, 2024

2024-04-15 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) for yandex: checked signatures, licences, checksums, reproducibility. On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 2:51 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > databricks provider is excluded from RC2 > let the vote continue only for yandex provider > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 8:10 AM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > -1 (non