Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 22, 2024

2024-06-23 Thread Rahul Vats
+1 non-binding. Verified running some example dags. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 09:41, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested some example dags in cncf and hive providers. My changes work well > too! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, Jun

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 22, 2024

2024-06-23 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding Tested some example dags in cncf and hive providers. My changes work well too! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:02 AM Marcus Eagan wrote: > Amazing work! > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 07:47 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding): tested signatures,

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Introduce common.compat provider

2024-06-23 Thread Amogh Desai
This is awesome. Waiting to see how it works in action! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 2:04 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Common compat provider is added. Now we can use it for any kind of > compatibility code with earlier Airflow versions. We might add later some >

Re: System Test Dashboards - Phase Two??

2024-06-23 Thread Freddy Demiane
Hello, Thank you for the comments! Indeed, +1 to the idea, I believe this would be a good step to increase the quality of providers. From our (Google) side, the dashboard's CI outputs the results to a database, which are then used to generate an HTML page. Yet, generating and publishing a JSON or

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 22, 2024

2024-06-23 Thread Marcus Eagan
Amazing work! On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 07:47 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): tested signatures, checksums, licences, reproducibility, > checked my changes. All looks good. > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 3:26 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow