Re: [VOTE] deprecate days_ago helper function

2022-02-04 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 3, 2022, 17:03 Daniel Standish wrote: > Hi > > I would like to call a vote on the following proposal: > > Helper function `days_ago` is to be deprecated (warning of pending removal > with each call) with removal targeted for 3.0. The deprecation warning > should guide

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

2020-12-03 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Following the discussion in https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12744 > > I would like to ask for a lazy consensus to get 4 providers installed > always when you install airflow: > > While they are separated out as

Re: [VOTE] AIP-17: Consolidate and de-duplicate sensor tasks in airflow Smart Sensor

2020-07-22 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:12 PM Kevin Yang wrote: > Thank you everyone for the feedback! I think the PR covered what is being > proposed in the AIP and does not have big controversial change that cannot > be revised easily. The feature itself has also been baked in Airbnb's large

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-06-01 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 for option 1 as well On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) > Following the discussion > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.10 based on 1.10.10rc5 (Accelerated vote)

2020-04-09 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:55 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hello Apache Airflow Community, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version 1.10.10. > > This RC has a single change ( > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/f5833a9e57d8e85b1d2b1d93593bfc0089427e49 > )

2020 ASF Community Survey

2019-12-05 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
Hello everyone, If you have an apache.org email, you should have received an email with an invitation to take the 2020 ASF Community Survey. Please take 15 minutes to complete it. If you do not have an apache.org email address or you didn’t receive a link, please follow this link to the survey:

Re: I have joined Astronomer full-time !!

2019-06-24 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
Congratulations Kaxil! Best wishes, Arthur On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:53 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi all, > > I have already posted this on LinkedIn but for others in the community, I > am super-excited to announce that as of 20 June I have joined Astronomer as > a full-time employee. And

Re: [VOTE] AIP-16: CLI: Use nested commands instead of flags

2019-06-11 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) Best, Arthur On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 04:15 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Hi Airflowers, > > This email calls for a vote to introduce restructure the CLI to use nested > commands instead of flags. The vote will last for at least 1 week (June > 18th 12:00 BST), and at least three +1

Re: Announcement: I'm joining Astronomer!

2019-05-30 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
Daniel, Congratulations! Very exciting! Best, Arthur On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:07 PM Daniel Imberman wrote: > Hello Airflow community! > > I'm unbelievably excited to announce that after a (much-needed) vacation > through the month of June (hmu if anyone happens to live in Chiang Mai or >

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Changes in import paths

2019-04-18 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
> > You can not put this document on the mailing list because the document > contains advanced formatting. > > I will try to put this document in the wiki in the near future to the > archival purpose. I would like to point out that this is not the final > document and contains the final

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Changes in import paths

2019-04-18 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
Comments inline On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 11:10 Kamil Breguła wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:30 PM Arthur Wiedmer > wrote: > > > Hi Kamil, > > > > Thank you for this doc, it was a lot of good work to put all of this > > together. Could you open the doc

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Changes in import paths

2019-04-18 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
Hi Kamil, Thank you for this doc, it was a lot of good work to put all of this together. Could you open the doc for comment? May I recommend that once comments have been added to eventually port the doc to the wiki and keep trace of the history there as well. Here are my choices Case #1 B or A

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-3: Drop support for Python 2

2019-03-23 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 4:19 PM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > Dear Airflow community, > > This email calls for a vote to accept Airflow Improvement Proposal 3: Drop > support for Python 2 > > The vote will last for at least 1 week until Midnight Sunday 31th of March, > and until three

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-13: OpenAPI 3 based API definition

2019-02-21 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 (binding) This is the direction we should be taking. On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:28 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Dear Airflow community, > > This email calls for a vote to accept Airflow Improvement Proposal 13: > OpenAPI 3 based API definition. > > The vote will last for at least 1 week,