Re: Drop Python 3.5 support?

2019-11-12 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 from my side too! Bolke de Bruin schrieb am Di., 12. Nov. 2019, 22:39: > I guess thats a +1 then? :-) > > Op di 12 nov. 2019 22:36 schreef Jarek Potiuk : > > > I'd love to get rid of python 3.5 > > > > We discussed it a few times but as of recently the main problem was that > > 3.5 was defaul

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to Pytest

2019-10-16 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 from my side too. Regards, Chris Driesprong, Fokko schrieb am Mi., 16. Okt. 2019, 17:01: > +1 > > Op ma 14 okt. 2019 om 16:50 schreef Felix Uellendall > >: > > > +1, successfully using pytest for airflow plugins for almost 2 years now. > > > > Felix > > > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > >

Re: [VOTE] Change the Airflow logo

2019-08-21 Thread Christian Lellmann
Hi, I vote for option 1. Cheers, Chris Ash Berlin-Taylor schrieb am Mi., 21. Aug. 2019, 12:58: > The discuss thread had a positive response so I'm now calling for a VOTE > on updating the Airflow logo to one of the designs below. > > (Since no one said "I like the existing logo" I have not put

Re: airflow command not working

2019-08-21 Thread Christian Lellmann
Hi Ullas, unfortunately, the airflow commands don't run on Windows like they do on Linux. I solved this problem by running Airflow in a Docker container on Windows or you could try using the WSL2. But I'm not sure if it's already general available on Windows 10. Cheers, Chris Driesprong, Fokko

Re: [DISCUSS] Tweaks to the Airflow logo

2019-08-13 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 I like the clean and straight design! Best, Chris Daniel Standish schrieb am Mi., 14. Aug. 2019, 06:09: > > > > Maybe there is solid reasoning behind this change; if so, that reasoning > > would be welcome. > > Oh this info is in the referenced pdf 🤦‍♂️ > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:51 PM

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Remove `dag >> task`?

2019-07-03 Thread Christian Lellmann
Me neither. Also from me +1 (non-binding) on removal. Tao Feng schrieb am Mi., 3. Juli 2019, 18:38: > I am not aware of this feature either. And +1 on removing it. > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 9:36 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > I am definitely sure that 99% of users, including me, didn't knew this >

Re: [VOTE] Labelling scheme for the upcoming official docker images of Airflow

2019-06-26 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 (non-binding) Regards Chris Jarek Potiuk schrieb am Do., 27. Juni 2019, 06:57: > Hello Airflow community, > > This email call for a vote on "Labelling scheme" for the docker images we > are going to publish at > https://cloud.docker.com/u/apache/repository/docker/apache/airflow. The > vote

Re: I have joined Astronomer full-time !!

2019-06-23 Thread Christian Lellmann
Congrats Kaxil! Have nice time! :) Deng Xiaodong schrieb am So., 23. Juni 2019, 05:32: > Congrats Kaxil. Have a nice marriage vacation! > > XD > > > On 23 Jun 2019, at 5:41 AM, Bas Harenslak > wrote: > > > > Congrats Kaxil on both events! > > > > Bas > > > > On 22 Jun 2019, at 11:53, Felix Ue

Re: [VOTE] AIP-16: CLI: Use nested commands instead of flags

2019-06-11 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 (non-binding) Jiajie Zhong schrieb am Di., 11. Juni 2019, 13:43: > +1 (non-binding) > > > Best Wish > — Jiajie > > > > On Jun 11, 2019, at 19:21, Kaxil Naik kaxiln...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 12:15 Ash Berlin-Taylor a...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Hi Airflo

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a user@ list?

2019-05-24 Thread Christian Lellmann
+1 Kaxil Naik schrieb am Fr., 24. Mai 2019, 09:47: > +1 > > On Fri, May 24, 2019, 08:12 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1. I think Airflow user's community is quite strong so this might be > > rather useful. Also there are lots of discussions on slack channels - > > #troubleshooting for example - wh

Re: Call for fixes for 1.10.4

2019-05-19 Thread Christian Lellmann
Hi all, would it be possible to add the Bugfix of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4526? Thank you and best regards Chris Chen Tong schrieb am So., 19. Mai 2019, 21:05: > Hi Kaxil, > > Can you help merge this PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4991? > These is another PR