Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 Multi-team deployment of Airflow components

+1 (non-binding) Great to see this happening, hope we will see more proposals towards making Airflow more flexible! Regards, Igor On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 8:10 PM Daniel Standish wrote: > > > > It doesn’t affect my vote on the API, but I am very strongly against this > > one part of the AIP: >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:28 PM Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > +1 binding. > > This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning > context (which we also should do, to be clear). > > TP > > > > On Mar 26, 2024, at 02:12, Aritra Basu wrote: > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] AIP 61 - Hybrid Executors

+1 (non-binding) Best, Igor On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 2:23 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Looking forward to it! > > Best, > Wei > > > On Feb 1, 2024, at 7:57 PM, Aritra Basu > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > This would definitely be a good value add. Looked through the

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard URI representation for Airflow Datasets)

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:03 AM Maciej Obuchowski wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 22:51 Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) > wrote: > > > +1 binding as discussed - looking forward for this and THANKS! > > > > Sent from Outlook for iOS

Re: [VOTE] AIP-58 Airflow ObjectStore

Thanks for incorporating the feedback! +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:55 PM Dennis Akpenyi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:24 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote: > > > Dear Community, > > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-58 Add Airflow ObjectStore". > > > >

Re: Request for feedback on proposal for new OpenLineage provider in Airflow

+1, would be happy to join the session! (Please add either ikholo...@google.com or kholopo...@gmail.com). Best, Igor On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 11:27 PM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > Same here if you can add me please. > > Looking forward to this session. > > Le mer. 22 mars 2023 à 23:07, Mehta,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Brent Bovenzi

Congrats, Brent! On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:47 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Congrats Brent > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 08:18, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > Congratulations Brent! > > > > > > From: Pankaj Koti > > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 7:56:44 AM > > To:

Re: AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support - Take Three

I'd also be happy to help out with this effort. We've been interested in improving the quality of signals produced by Airflow for a while - they are critical for making task failure easier and more accessible. Let me know once the plan is updated, I will be happy to pick up some work! On

Re: [VOTE] AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from Core Airlfow

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 6:27 PM Darren Weber wrote: > > +1 > > This turned out to be a sticking point while considering AIP-28 (replaced > by AIP-40) > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:44 AM Xiaodong Deng wrote: > >> Just read through the AIP. It reads nice & solid  >> >> +1