Re: Committers: Let's be more strict for PR Reviews

These guidelines make sense generally, but I’m concerned a bit with the requirement for two reviews for core changes. 1. It’s not clear to me what core changes are. Does this just mean anything not related to providers? 2. Airflow, to put it delicately, does not excel at getting changes merged i

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.1.3 is released

Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.1.3 was just released. The source release, as well as the binary "sdist" release, are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/2.1.3/ We also made this version available on PyPI for convenience (`pip install

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.3 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Aug 17, 2021, 5:42 PM -0700, Kaxil Naik , wrote: > (The email is on James's behalf) > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 1:40 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > > > > > We have cut Airflow 2.1.3 RC1. This email is calling a vote on the > > > release, which will las

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.1.1 is released

Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.1.1 was just released. The source release, as well as the binary "sdist" release, are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/2.1.1/ We also made this version available on PyPi for convenience (`pip install

[Result][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.1 from RC1

Hi Airflow Community, The vote to release Apache Airflow Upgrade Check 2.1.1 based on 2.1.1rc1 is now closed. The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 5 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: Binding: Ash Kaxil Jarek Non-binding: Ephraim James Elad Jed Xinbin Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thr

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.1 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Jun 26, 2021, 4:16 AM -0700, Jarek Potiuk , wrote: > For convenience of people testing the release, I've also pushed > 2.1.1rc1 docker images to our DockerHub: > > Those images are available for everyone to test (they also contain the > latest provider packages released in June)

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.0 from RC2

+1 (non-binding) On May 18, 2021, 8:03 AM -0700, Nathan Hadfield , wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > >  • Verified running lots of our production DAGs against GCP, AWS and external > APIs. >  • I also love calendar view and the return of curved dependency lines in > GraphView! > > Cheers, > > Nathan >

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.0 from RC1

Hey fellow Airflowers, We've cut Airflow 2.1.0 RC1. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 12:30am UTC until Friday, May 21, 2021 at 12:30 am UTC, or until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (non-binding) +1.

Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval

Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of > > > > > >

[VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval

and until 3 binding votes have been cast. https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137 Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote. Ch

Re: [DISCUSS][AIP-39] Richer (and pluggable) schedule_interval on DAGs

0 AM -0800, Kaxil Naik , wrote: > Yup I have no strong opinions on either so happy to keep it TimeTable or if > there is another suggestion. > > Regards, > Kaxil > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 5:00 PM James Timmins > > wrote: > > > Respectfully, I st

Re: [DISCUSS][AIP-39] Richer (and pluggable) schedule_interval on DAGs

Respectfully, I strongly disagree with the renaming of Timetable to Schedule. Schedule and Scheduler aren't meaningfully different, which can lead to a lot of confusion. Even as a native English speaker, and someone who works on Airflow full time, I routinely need to ask for clarification about wha

Re: New Committers: James Timmins, Elad Kalif & Daniel Standish

Thanks y’all! It’s a privilege to be part of such a great community! On Mar 4, 2021, 11:49 AM -0800, Leah Cole , wrote: > Yay! Great job! > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:58 AM Tobiasz Kędzierski > > wrote: > > > Congratulations ! :) > > > > > > > wt., 2 mar 2021 o 16:18 Elad Kalif napisał(a): > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-38: Modern Web Application

+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ry Walker wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:36 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:33 PM Brent Bovenzi >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Brent >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:31 AM Ryan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.1 from 2.0.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) Tested locally w Python 3.8 and sqlite. Confirmed that corrected DAG execution permissions work as expected, and the the trigger/reset/delete UI commands are inactive when the user doesn't have permission to perform those actions. James On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Tomasz Urb

Re: Scoping out a new feature for 2.1: improving schedule_interval

Django provides a really good model for allowing users to customize the behavior of Class Based Views. It's in line w/ what Daniel/Kaxil and co are saying about a consistent backend class. It uses a standard base class as well as a default concrete implementation. Customization then only requires s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Daniel Imberman wrote: > +1 !! (binding) > > via Newton Mail > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:18 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Third time is

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.0.0 from 2.0.0rc1

An emphatic (non-binding) +1 !!! On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:58 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Hi my lovely Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.0.0 RC1. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will run for five days, until 2020-12-14T17:00:00Z > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.14 based on 1.10.14rc4

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:30 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Same checks as previous RCS. Signatures OK. SHA OK. RAT check passes. > Works in a few combinations of python, backend, rbac. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:47 PM Xiaodong Deng wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding). >>

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jarek Potiuk >> wrote: >> >>> Following the discussion in >>> https://github.com/apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.13 based on 1.10.13rc1

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, James Astronomer | Senior Software Engineer On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 9:03 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 4:45 PM Tobiasz Kędzierski < > tobiasz.kedzier...@polidea.com> wrote: > >> +1 non-binding >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:15 PM Ka

Re: New Committers (Leah Cole & Ry Walker)

Congrats to you both!! On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:54 AM Ry Walker wrote: > Thanks all! > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:49 PM QP Hou wrote: > > > Congrats to both Leah and Ry! the family is growing fast :) > > > > Thanks, > > QP Hou > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:18 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: >