Re: [DISCUSS] Adding better support for parametrized DAGs and dynamic DAGs using JSON/YAML dataformats

2021-11-26 Thread Siddharth VP
> content to the dag_code table. > > One obvious downside to this approach is that whenever I upgrade airflow I > have to double check in staging that my hack still works. But the function > I patch is super simple and my change is like 4 extra lines of code, so I > don't mind it

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding better support for parametrized DAGs and dynamic DAGs using JSON/YAML dataformats

2021-08-21 Thread Siddharth VP
cution in future versions (i.e. 2.2) so we can't do that. > > -ash > > On Sat, Aug 21 2021 at 09:50:57 +0530, Siddharth VP > wrote: > > Yes per my commit linked above, it would be the yaml file that is shown in > the webserver code view (because the fileloc field p

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding better support for parametrized DAGs and dynamic DAGs using JSON/YAML dataformats

2021-08-20 Thread Siddharth VP
dding better support for parametrized DAGs and >> dynamic DAGs using JSON/YAML dataformats >> >> >> >> Airflow DAGS are Python code.This is a very basic assumption - which is >> not likely to change. Ever. >> >> >> >> And we are working on

[DISCUSS] Adding better support for parametrized DAGs and dynamic DAGs using JSON/YAML dataformats

2021-08-20 Thread Siddharth VP
Would like to know your thoughts on this. Thanks! Siddharth VP