Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.2 from 2.10.2rc1

+1 non-binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:35 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the > helm chart with a few different configs. >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.10.1 Released

d the release notes here for more details: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.10.1/release_notes.html Container images are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1&name=2.10.1 Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.1 from 2.10.1rc1

2.2 (#41943) - Protect against None components of universal pathlib xcom backend (#41938) *Doc Only Change:* - Remove Debian bullseye support (#41569) - Add an example for auth with ``keycloak`` (#41791) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Python Client 2.10.0 Released

https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/ Find the changelog here for more details: https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc2

org/thread/qr0gvqvoltwqtyqn2q1myzmsnqplp2xw I'll continue with the release process, and the release announcement will follow shortly.Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] August 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #41390 Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:06 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 for #41390 > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:41 AM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 for #41390 because we're getting rid of so much querying happening on > > the unneeded

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc2

/38449)) - Add dag re-parsing request endpoint ([#39138]( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39138)) - Reorder OpenAPI Spec tags alphabetically ([#38717]( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38717)) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

Hey fellow Airflowers, We encountered issues during the reproducibility testing of the package, which led us to cancel the vote for RC1. I will be creating RC2 shortly. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:23 PM Utkarsh Sharma < utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io> wrote: > H

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

ically ([#38717]( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38717)) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow 2.11 as bridge release

+1 non binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:58 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > + 1 > but I think we should clarify the mental model of the 2.11 release. > > I wouldn't say it will have no features. If there are no features then why > 2.11? it can just be 2.10.x

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

ceived: - Rahul Vats - Utkarsh Sharma Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 1:44 AM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > We can have it in 2.10.1 or 2.11.0 if it can't be in a patch release. > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 21:07, Tzu-ping Chung > wrote: > > > I think this n

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.10.0 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Kaxil Naik - Jed Cunningham - Ephraim Anierobi 2 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Rahul Vats - Utkarsh Sharma Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/sho6wrdkmtx2vzh18z

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

Dear Airflow Community, We are currently experiencing some CI-related issues, which will temporarily delay the availability of the Docker image for Airflow 2.10.0 RC1. We anticipate that it will take a few hours to resolve these issues. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:33 AM

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

dags in use params section (#41031) - Change ``task_id`` from ``send_email`` to ``send_email_notification`` in ``taskflow.rst`` (#41060) - Remove unnecessary nginx redirect rule from reverse proxy documentation (#38953) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Jens Schaffler

Congratulations Jens! :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 2:42 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Congratulations Jens, very well deserved! > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 09:24, Pierre Jeambrun > wrote: > > > Congratulations Jens! > > > > On Tue 6 Aug 2024 at 10:08, Buğra Öztürk > wrote: > > > > > Congratulations Jens 🎊

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 03, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:20 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licences, checksums, signatures, > checked my changes, all looks good. > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:46 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all

Apache Airflow 2.10.0b2 available for testing

- (img/edge_label_example.png): changed imaged to new label view (#38802) - Update UI doc screenshots (#38680) - Add section "Manipulating queued dataset events through REST API" (#41022) - Add information about lack of security guarantees for docker compose (#41072) - Add links to example dags in use params section (#41031) - Change ``task_id`` from ``send_email`` to ``send_email_notification`` in ``taskflow.rst`` (#41060) - Add more detail on when dataset alias is resolved Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run

+1 binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:10 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 17:40, Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 15:34, Pavankumar Gopidesu < > gopidesupa...@gmail.com&g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.1 Released

https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/ Find the changelog here for more details: https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.1 from 2.9.1rc1

pm2050f4v0l0g9 I'll continue with the release process, and the release announcement will follow shortly.Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] AIPs 73 74 75: Data Awareness with Assets

+1 binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 4:29 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 00:26, Pavankumar Gopidesu > > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Regards, > > Pavan Kumar > > &

Re: AWS Open Source Credits Program

Sounds great! :) On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 4:17 PM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > Great news! > > On Sat 27 Jul 2024 at 01:15, Sadha Chilukoori > wrote: > > > That's wonderful news. > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:34 PM Oliveira, Niko > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > This is a shor

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.1 from 2.9.1rc1

_CLIENT.md\#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors *Changelog:* *Major changes:* - Add max_consecutive_failed_dag_runs in API spec ([#39830]( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39830)) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

Hey fellow Airflowers, I’m canceling this vote due to the incorrect increment of the Python client version and will create a new release with the correct version 2.9.0rc1. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:00 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Sure :) > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

Hey @Jarek Potiuk , I started with the Python Client 2.9.1 release, before seeing a couple of last emails, but since I already have your approval on one of the PR for the 2.9.1 release, I'm considering it as a go-ahead. :) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:41 PM Jarek P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

Hey Jarek, Thanks, I didn't know that about that. It was a wrong assumption on my part. Should we also mention this in the client release docs? Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:29 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): verified reproducibility, checksum, signatures

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.15.0 based on 1.15.0rc1

+1 binding On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:14 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:33 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding): checked reproducibility, licences, signatures, checksums. I > > run airflow locally using the chart - looks good with 2.9.3 being > default. >

Re: [VOTE] AIPs 73 74 75: Data Awareness with Assets

+1 binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:45 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 binding for all the 3 AIPs > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jul 22, 2024, at 10:49 PM, Aritra Basu > wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding > > -- > > Regards, > > A

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

b/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PYTHON_CLIENT.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors *Changelog:* *Major changes:* - Add max_consecutive_failed_dag_runs in API spec ([#39830]( https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39830)) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] AIP-66: DAG Bundles and Parsing

+1 binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:33 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 binding > > I really love the way the AIP has been written to target small pieces > instead > of doing everything related to versioning together. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amog

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.9.3 Released

lease notes here for more details: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.9.3/release_notes.html Container images are published at: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags/?page=1&name=2.9.3 Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

ts.apache.org/thread/tt0qpnq38rswfko3tcgnnbc4517h7h46 I'll continue with the release process, and the release announcement will follow shortly. Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committers: Rom Sharon & Shahar Epstein

Congratulations! 🎉🎉. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:38 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Wooohooo! Congrats! > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 2:29 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu < > gopidesupa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Congratulations Rom and Shahar 🎉🎉. > &g

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

as build dependency (#40542) - Upgrade to latest version of hatchling as build dependency (#40387) - Fix bug in ``SchedulerJobRunner._process_executor_events`` (#40563) - Remove logging for "blocked" events (#40446) Cheers, Utkarsh Sharma

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2024

+1 (non-binding) ran a few examples of dags and they worked as expected. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 1:09 PM Freddy Demiane wrote: > +1 (non-binding) for Google Provider Package. We ran our system tests CI > against providers-google/10.21.0rc1 and we got green tests.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Ryan Hatter

Congratulations Ryan! :) On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 at 11:53 AM, Phani Kumar wrote: > Congratulations Ryan > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, 07:30 Wei Lee, wrote: > > > Congratulations, Ryan! Welcome! > > > > Best, > > Wei > > > > > On Jun 29, 2024, at 3:20 AM, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) < > > jens.schef

Re: [VOTE] June 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #39355. Finally, I don't have to use Mac's night shift to run airflow. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:19 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 for #39355. Love dark mode! > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jun 28, 2024, at 11:00 AM, Mehta, Shubham > wrote:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.9.2 Released

Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.9.2 was just released. The released sources and packages can be downloaded via https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html Other installation methods are described in https://airflow.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.9.2 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Hussein Awala - Jarek Potiuk - Elad Kalif 4 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Rom Sharon - Phani Kumar - Scheffler Jens - Rahul Vats Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/zz10dy2kqy0c8c0dq0bz7

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1

Hey fellow Airflowers, I have cut Airflow 2.9.2rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last at least 72 hours, from Thursday, June 6, 2024 at 12:00 pm UTC until Sunday, June 9, 2024 at 12:00 pm UTC

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

Verified Amazon provider changes, working as expected. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding ) for Amazon, google, and azure verified our example dags > worked fine. > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > O

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 10, 2024

+1 (non-binding) test a few example dags. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 11:46 AM Aritra Basu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > tested against some sample dags > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, 4:21 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > &

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Lee

Congratulations Wei! :) Thanks, Utkarsh On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:13 PM rom sharon wrote: > 🎉🎉!Congrats Wei > > ‫בתאריך יום ג׳, 9 באפר׳ 2024 ב-10:05 מאת ‪Elad Kalif‬‏ <‪ > elad...@apache.org > ‬‏>:‬ > > > Congrats! > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:15 AM Vikram Koka > > > wrote: > > > > > Awesom

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:46 PM Brent Bovenzi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:23 PM Oliveira, Niko > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) Glad this is finally getting some love! > > > > > > From: Ankit Chaurasia > > Sent: Tuesday, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.13.0 based on 1.13.0rc1

+1 Non binding. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharrma On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:08 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding. > > Installed the helm chart in a test cluster, played around a bit and ran > some example DAGs. > Looks good! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 8:29 PM Ephra

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

+1 Non-binding. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:11 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:48 rom sharon, wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת ‪Rahul Vats‬‏ <‪ > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 07, 2024

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 7:11 AM, Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 3:31 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:14 PM Aritra Basu > > wrote: > > > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Aritra Basu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Looking for potential new security team members

Hey Jarek, I'm very interested in security-related stuff, but not sure if I fit the bill. :) Thanks, Utkarsh On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:43 AM Ryan Hatter wrote: > What are the criteria? Just curious, as I'm quite confident I do not fit > the criteria 😀 > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 9:21 AM Jarek Po

Re: [DISCUSS] Interested in joining/leaving the triage team ?

I can move out of triage team now :) On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 8:15 PM, Rahul Vats wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > As discussed in #issue-triage, I would also like to nominate myself for the > triage team. > > > Regards, > > Rahul Vats > > On Tue, 2 Jan, 2024, 18:29 Ankit Chaurasia, wrote: > > > Hi Jarek, >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 31, 2023

+1(non-binding) tested my changes. On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 6:16 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 24 hours - accelerated vote which means that it will > end on Januar

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 28, 2023

-1 (non-binding) for Weavaite provider. I found an issue with the provider, which I unfortunately missed in my initial testing. Raised a PR <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36475> for the same. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 2:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey a

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 23, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes in apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.2.0rc1 Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 10:16 PM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > We have also tested apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.2.0rc1, in > addition to the providers ment

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc1

+1 non binding On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 5:23 PM, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Installed the RC bits and ran example DAGs. > > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 5:22 PM, Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:10 PM Pankaj Koti > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc4

+1 Non-binding On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 5:13 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:50 PM Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 4:13 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

> > >> > > > Google and databricks will get RC3 (PRs to fix them are already > > >> > created). > > >> > > > I'd still love to have +1 PMC votes on the remaining 3 :) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > J > > >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

-1 (non-binding) I looked into Databricks providers and the PR introduced breaking changes I have added my concern in the comment . Also, I don't think there is an easy way to make row ob

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 08, 2023

+1 Tested Weaviate provider related changes. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:26 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (none-binding) for providers other than Google and Docker. > > Best, > Wei > > > On Dec 11, 2023, at 3:07 PM, Rahul Vats wrote: > > > > +

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Utkarsh Sharma

; > > > From: Pankaj Koti > > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 11:28:41 AM > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [ANNOUNCE] New committer: > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > CAUTION: This email origi

Re: [VOTE] November PR of the Month

+1 for 32646, great work. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:50 AM Collin McNulty wrote: > +1 to 32646. Been wanting this for a long time! > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:50 AM Briana Okyere > wrote: > > > Happy Holidays Everyone :) > > > > It’s o

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 24, 2023

+1 (non binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:59 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1 non binding. > > > > Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around > > a

Re: [DISCUSS] Suspend/Remove Plexus provider

+1 on removing it. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 9:55 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 let us remove it. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 9:09 AM Aritra Basu > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > R

Re: [DISCUSS] Suspend/Remove Apache Scoop provider

+1 On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 9:06 PM, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 > > > On Nov 23, 2023, at 11:30 PM, Phani Kumar > > > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 8:24 PM Vincent Beck > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On 2023/11/23 13:08:09 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> czw., 23 lis 2023,

Re: [DISCUSS] Move FAB auth manager to a new provider

+1 to moving it to providers, since it gives more flexibility. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 5:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Ah ... put it in a wrong thread, sorry :) ... > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:39 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > OK. Seeing that - I think

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate URI Connection representation in favor of JSON

al of adding "airflowconnection+" or just "airflow+" prefix to the schema, which should also solve its misinterpretation as a common URI. Also, I share the concerns regarding the breaking changes. So I would like to vote -1. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 3:21

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 12, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 3:06 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:43 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, sources. Looks > like > > the fixes we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jens Scheffler

Congratulations Jens! :) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 1:01 AM Vincent Beck wrote: > > Welcome onboard Jens! > > On 2023/11/07 19:24:04 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow > > has invited Jens Scheffler to b

Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for 34729 :) great work on that. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:34 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my vote to > that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing Qubole provider (and adding removal process)

+1 for the implementing the process, have little clue about the provider. :) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:59 PM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > > +1 > > Le ven. 27 oct. 2023 à 19:16, Aritra Basu a > écrit : > > > Sounds like a good time to set the proces

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

DRY principle, but I was eventually hoping that we make Hugo's way to visualize the website primary and can depreciate the `sphinx_airflow_theme` altogether. What do you all think? Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:40 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > Yeah, excellent team! > > Utkarsh note tha

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 28, 2023

M Elad Kalif wrote: > > > docs are published only after the vote is accepted and we release the > > packages. > > PR https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/885 is handling the > release > > of docs for the prepared packages > > > > On Sat, Oct 28,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 28, 2023

-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.3.0rc1/changelog.html Is there any other way I can check this? Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:25 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on

Re: AIP-49 OpenTelemetry call for action/help

Hey Freuzzi, I’m available for this, I do have brief experience with open telemetry. Please let me know how I can help. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 10:42 PM, Aritra Basu wrote: > Hi, > I can try helping out, though I haven't much experience working with otel, >

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

That sounds good, I'll start with creating smaller tickets for the above task, which I intend to do by the end of this week. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:16 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > Yup, sounds good to me let's go for it! > > -- > Regards, > Aritr

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

Hey everyone, If we have a consensus on the suggestions in my previous email, I would like to subdivide the task into smaller tickets and distribute them among Aritra Basu, Amogh Desai, and myself. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:12 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Those look l

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 4:10 PM, Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 06:32 Andrey Anshin, > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > > > Best Wishes > > *Andrey Anshin* > > > >

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

Just forgot to mention in my previous mail, that I'm suggesting the above changes since the storage is not the primary concern right now but I'm happy to contribute either way. :) On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:43 PM utkarsh sharma wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I have a couple of

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

repo docs//*.rst file. 2. If we have a change that affects multiple providers or versions we can do it on Airflow Website's repo. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 3:45 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > So it looks like we have some helping hands and we need someone to lead it >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add 5 new Providers to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 From my side as well. Also, having a dashboard to publish system test results for the providers will ensure the expected working in the long run. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 4:44 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 Many people will be interested in contributing to th

Re: Airflow Docs Development Issues

/Flask Servers) of catering the documents we can save all the space for common HTML/CSS/JS. But the downsides of this approach are: 1. We need to have a server 2. Also require changes in the existing document build process to only produce partial HTML documents. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Oct 19

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 18, 2023

+1 non-binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 3:22 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). Checked signatures, checksum, licences, source code. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:03 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I have just cut the new w

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 13, 2023

+1 Non binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:06 PM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 10:27, Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 non binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 at 9:17 PM, Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 (binding). Licences, checksums and signatures look good. Also ran a few > api requests against my local install, working as expected. > > Le ven. 13 oct. 2023 à 09:12, Ephraim Ani

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 Non-binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 12, 2023, at 10:47 AM, Phani Kumar > > > wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.11.0 based on 1.11.0rc2

+1 Non Binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 3:49 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > > +1 non binding > > Tested by changes #31615 and #33686. They work as expected. No regressions > from the previous RC > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > On Sun, Oct 1,

Re: [VOTE] September 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for #28900 Thanks, Utkarsh On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 2:13 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > > +1 for #28900 > > > On Sat 30 Sep 2023 at 10:40, Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > > > +1 for 28900 > > > > On Fri 29 Sep 2023 at 23:14, Mehta, Shubham > > wrote: > > > > > + 1 to #28900. That required a lot of perse

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Pankaj Koti and Amogh Desai as committers

Congratulations @Pankaj and @Amogh :) On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 at 7:47 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Everyone: > > I am happy to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for > Apache Airflow has invited Pankaj Koti and Amogh Desai to become committers > and we are pleased to announce th

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 12, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 8:20 PM Pankaj Singh wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:23 PM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested some example dags with DBT without encountering

Re: [VOTE] Drop MsSQL as supported backend

+1 non binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 1:04 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > > +1 non binding > Based on previous discussions. > > Thanks & Best Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 13:03 Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

+1 (non-binding) ran internal dags with rc2 working as expected. Thanks, Utkarsh On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > > Hi, > > Was able to run RC2 within breeze env. Ran my set of dags on it - regular > dags and dags with operators. Doesn't look like there is any regression > in

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 11, 2023

+1 non-biding Thanks, Utkarsh On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Concur with Wei & Rahul. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > Email: p

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 09, 2023

+1 non-binding Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 4:05 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > +1 binding > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 10:35, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > +1 (binding) I checked the signatures, the checksums and the source code. > > And I tested my change.

Re: [HELP NEEDED] Styling CSS skills wanted for our Sphinx 7 - generated docs

@Jarek Thanks, didn't know the attachments are blocked. Also, I'll try to isolate the new and old SCSS file. On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 9:40 PM utkarsh sharma wrote: > Sure @Amogh we can connect on Slack if you are available. I just started > looking into it. > > On Mon,

Re: [HELP NEEDED] Styling CSS skills wanted for our Sphinx 7 - generated docs

ferent > > name because old generated versions of docs will continue to use the > > old css. We do not want to generate and commit 50 Million of lines of > > code :D > > > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 9:41 PM utkarsh sharma > > wrote: > > > > > > I

Re: [HELP NEEDED] Styling CSS skills wanted for our Sphinx 7 - generated docs

I just changed the CSS in the local browser, please check the attachment. :) I'll try to raise a PR in the morning. Thanks, Utkarsh On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 1:03 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Can't see it mage :) . Link ? > > niedz., 6 sie 2023, 21:28 użytkownik utkarsh s

Re: [HELP NEEDED] Styling CSS skills wanted for our Sphinx 7 - generated docs

Hey Jerek, Can you please confirm if the below image is having expected spacing? [image: Screenshot 2023-08-07 at 12.52.57 AM.png] Thanks, Utkarsh On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:42 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I prepared a pre-release (based on fresh-from-the-press > sphinx-rtd-the

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2023

+1 non binding. Tested apprise provider https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apprise/1.0.1rc1/ On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 9:42 PM, Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2023, 20:54 Hussein Awala, wrote: > > > +1 (binding) I tested my change and I checked the signatures

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Hussein Awala

Congratulations well deserved :) On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 3:08 PM, Pankaj Singh wrote: > Congrats Hussein 🚀 > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:14 PM Ankit Chaurasia > wrote: > > > Congratulations > > > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 11:43, Phani Kumar > .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Congrats Hussein > >

Re: [VOTE] PR of the Month for the Airflow Newsletter

+1 for #32525 On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 8:15 AM Mehta, Shubham wrote: > +1 to #30727. Without going into details, 50-60% optimization in any > aspect of Airflow is amazing. > > Shubham > > On 2023-07-26, 11:06 AM, "Michael Robinson" > michael.robin...@astronomer.io.inva>LID> wrote: > > > CAUTION

Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature

+1 (non binding) On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw > wrote: > > > +1 (Non-binding) > > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask" > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that: >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2023

+1 (non-binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

  1   2   >