>
> We should maybe move this conversation to slack if there’s anything
> specific in the AIP that I did not cover. Otherwise, I will submit it for
> vote and start breaking down the work in issues (I guess now GitHub
> issues?).
Yes, now that the Vote has passed, please feel free to start creati
Hi all,
Should we proceed with the vote?
T.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:37 AM Gerard Casas Saez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry for leaving this unfinished. I was commenting an extension that
> Tomasz suggested in the AIP doc, to add fields in the operator that serve
> as templated args. This sh
Hi everyone,
Sorry for leaving this unfinished. I was commenting an extension that Tomasz
suggested in the AIP doc, to add fields in the operator that serve as templated
args. This should be pretty easy to do if extending templated args. Not sure if
doing it extending templated_fields or add a
Hey Everybody
I am happy to contribute to this discussion! It's something that everybody
is missing at Airflow. If I am part of a discussion around orchestration
framework comparison, "functional DAGs” arguments are the most used ones.
We are building a similar approach and would be happy to bas
Short update on status after receiving some feedback on Slack and Confluence
comments:
• Updated description of PythonFunctionalOperator
• Added a few clarifying comments on how each component change plays along each
other
Reached out to Bolke to see if I can get his thoughts on how Lineage and
Ah yeah... I totally forgot about that :) (shame on me) ... But it does
seem appropriate if I came to the same conclusion again looking from
another angle :D
J.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:25 PM Gerard Casas Saez
wrote:
> Agree, I initially pitched the idea on the lineage thread and was
> e
Agree, I initially pitched the idea on the lineage thread and was encouraged to
pitch it separately. I would love to help figure out how to align this 2
projects better.
Bolke - want to set up a call or how should we discuss this better? Would love
to hear feedback on my proposal.
Gerard Casas
I like the idea a lot. Good direction.
I know we have a few people who are better in functional thinking than me
so I think I would love those people to work it out. Happy to listen to the
discussions :)
One thing that struck me however. I am not sure if that falls in the same
camp, but I have a
Here is the link to the AIP for folk's convenience:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-31%3A+Airflow+functional+DAG+API
The proposal and this all looks really good to me :)! I do want to call out
to others that it's important we get the interface 95%+ right from the
get-go sin
Hi everyone,
Sending a new message to everyone to gather feedback on the AIP-31 about
Airflow functional DAG API. This was initially discussed and proposed in
[DISCUSS] Airflow functional DAGs. After leaving open a small doc to iterate on
the proposal for a couple weeks, I decided to move forw
10 matches
Mail list logo
