Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-66: DAG Bundles & Parsing

2024-07-19 Thread Vikram Koka
Agreed. This looks really clean now. On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:25 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > It looks very good now :) ! Yeah. The "execution environment" has many, > many traps and edge cases. > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:19 PM Jed Cunningham > wrote: > > > I've removed my attempt to bring pyt

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-66: DAG Bundles & Parsing

2024-07-16 Thread Jarek Potiuk
It looks very good now :) ! Yeah. The "execution environment" has many, many traps and edge cases. On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:19 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > I've removed my attempt to bring python dependencies under versioning. The > scope is now DAG code and parsing control - still very useful,

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-66: DAG Bundles & Parsing

2024-07-16 Thread Jed Cunningham
I've removed my attempt to bring python dependencies under versioning. The scope is now DAG code and parsing control - still very useful, 3.0 specific, and hopefully a bit less controversial.

[DISCUSS] AIP-66: DAG Bundles & Parsing

2024-07-10 Thread Jed Cunningham
Hello everyone, I've just updated AIP-66 with my proposal for the execution changes in the AIP-63 DAG versioning story. You may notice the name of the AIP has also been changed - it now better reflects the changes being proposed. At a high level, this will allow for: - executing DAG runs on the s