Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

L EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Executors docs should > be published in Airflow core or providers? > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the conte

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

+1 to the proposal. I think core Airflow docs can contain details about the default executor that gets shipped with standalone Airflow installation and a short note about possibilities of using other (providers) executors in production and saying to look for detailed docs in the corresponding prov

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

Since we moved the executors to the providers packages and made the executor interface pluggable and extensible, we should move the docs to their corresponding providers. However, we need to keep a doc in Airflow core that explains how to use/configure a provider executor (as we have for the secret

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

___ > > From: Jarek Potiuk > > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2023 9:19 AM > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Executors docs > should be published in Airflow core or providers? > > > > CAUTION: This email

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

EL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be > published in Airflow core or providers? > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the > content is safe. > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

I like it. - ferruzzi From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Friday, September 8, 2023 9:19 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers? CAUTION: This email originated

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

+1 On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:18 PM Daniel Standish wrote: > Sounds reasonable. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

Sounds reasonable.

[DISCUSS] Executors docs should be published in Airflow core or providers?

Hello everyone, This thread is opened due to open issue Migrate Celery/Dask/Kubernetes Executor docs to providers *Background:* We had a discussion about extracting Celery, Kubernetes, Dask executors from core to providers (discussion thread