Re: [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop?

2024-08-26 Thread Wei Lee
2024 6:13:31 PM >> To: dev@airflow.apache.org >> Subject: [EXT] [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop? >> >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not >> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know >>

Re: [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop?

2024-08-21 Thread Jarek Potiuk
__ > From: Daniel Standish > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2024 6:13:31 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: [EXT] [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop? > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click li

Re: [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop?

2024-08-21 Thread Oliveira, Niko
PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: [EXT] [DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électroniqu

[DISCUSS] allow_trigger_in_future setting: keep or chop?

2024-08-15 Thread Daniel Standish
This setting, which affects scheduler behavior in a few places, seems like the type of thing that should not be configurable. I would propose we either always allow or always don't allow. Does anyone remember why we made it configurable? I don't have a strong feeling re allow or don't, but I gue