Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

PR here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15612 On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:38 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Cool. So if no-one else objects till the end of week I will update the > description to include K8S and make it clear that such Python/K8S 'dropping' > will happen with minor version bu

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Cool. So if no-one else objects till the end of week I will update the description to include K8S and make it clear that such Python/K8S 'dropping' will happen with minor version bump of Airflow.. J. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi all, > > Dropping support for a Python v

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Hi all, Dropping support for a Python version in my opinion is not a breaking change mainly because it does not affect current users. We will simply change python_requires field in setup.cfg: https://packaging.python.org/guides/distributing-packages-using-setuptools/#python-requires. i.e. if we c

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Sure! No hurry with that - I'd love to hear community voices here too ! On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 6:53 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Major I'm fine with - but I think Kaxil may have a case to make that > dropping support in a minor ver I think, so let's wait for his input. > > -a > > On 25 April 2

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Major I'm fine with - but I think Kaxil may have a case to make that dropping support in a minor ver I think, so let's wait for his input. -a On 25 April 2021 16:29:29 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >Any more comments? Are you Ash, and others concerned about dropping Python >version/ K8S versio witho

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Any more comments? Are you Ash, and others concerned about dropping Python version/ K8S versio without increasing the major version of Airflow? On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:01 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > This is a very valid point. > > I think it would not mean breaking change. We already have a "rule

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

This is a very valid point. I think it would not mean breaking change. We already have a "rule" that changing/upgrading dependencies is not a breaking change on it's own. We might choose a different route for Python and K8S being rather "big" dependencies and only drop them with the major version

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

I guess it wasn't quite clear what "finish" means, particularly how it interacts with SemVer and Airflow releases. Lets take Python 3.6 as a concrete example -- it is end of life at the end of this year, 23rd Dec, 202 1 <> Does dropping support for Python 3.6, e

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:35 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > This sounds good to me. > > The next question this leads me to is: when do we _drop_ support for a > version of Python or Kubernetes? > I believe that's the first point in the proposal ("finish" = "drop"). If that's not clear, I will cha

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

This sounds good to me. The next question this leads me to is: when do we _drop_ support for a version of Python or Kubernetes? -ash On Fri, 9 Apr, 2021 at 00:31, Jarek Potiuk wrote: Hey All, Following the message here:

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Yep. So someone is reading those :) On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:13 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > I think you meant 13th of April, Tuesday :) > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:32 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> Following the message here: >> >> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6c7addd1dcfddb

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

I think you meant 13th of April, Tuesday :) On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:32 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey All, > > Following the message here: > > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6c7addd1dcfddb9bb9bb5762fd8e0233a2ccdf59588405f170eaf60c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > I am calling for a lazy

[LAZY CONSENSUS] Policy for supporting K8S versions

Hey All, Following the message here: https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r6c7addd1dcfddb9bb9bb5762fd8e0233a2ccdf59588405f170eaf60c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E I am calling for a lazy consensus. If I do not hear back by 13th of March, Tuesday I will update the policy in https://github.com/apac