Yeah. I am officially canceling the RC2 vote now.
I also found another problem in the meantime: while the embedded README has
all the information about the package that is needed, CHANGELOG.txt
contains information about the changelog for the main
apache-airflow package, not the backport one.
Yes, let's cancel this vote and create rc3 after reviewing/fixing errors
that Bas found with his script.
Thanks Bas & Fokko.
Regards,
Kaxil
On Sat, May 23, 2020, 15:09 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Thanks Bas for looking at it. Much appreciated !
>
> >
> > (1) First general comment is the split in
Thanks Bas for looking at it. Much appreciated !
>
> (1) First general comment is the split in microsoft providers seems
unnecessary to me:
>
> *
> * apache-airflow-backport-providers-microsoft-azure==2020.5.20rc2
> * apache-airflow-backport-providers-microsoft-mssql==2020.5.20rc2
> *
Thanks Fokko again for the check on licences :).
I took a closer look and:
- The RAT tool is supposed to be run on the source package not the
binary releases. While the binary releases also follow the same guidelines
for containing license headers (
Busy week, couldn’t check it earlier…
3 comments:
(1) First general comment is the split in microsoft providers seems unnecessary
to me:
*
* apache-airflow-backport-providers-microsoft-azure==2020.5.20rc2
* apache-airflow-backport-providers-microsoft-mssql==2020.5.20rc2
*
Was that license check of the binary package (not the source?) Fokko? If so I
think those "missing" licenses are probably okay (and our normal binary
releases of Airflow would have the same exceptions?)
On 23 May 2020 11:34:43 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>Cool! Thanks for checking! I will take a
Cool! Thanks for checking! I will take a close look at those later today
but it looks like we are going to need rc3 :(
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:19 AM Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
> I have a few questions. I saw the thread and it would be great to move this
> forward. Currently I don't have time
I have a few questions. I saw the thread and it would be great to move this
forward. Currently I don't have time to test all the individual packages. I
did take the celery one and ran the Release Audit Tool (RAT) of Apache:
https://gist.github.com/Fokko/50bb812a4998e34f4274965276a60f8e
Files with
Whoa. One more PMC vote and we can finally release it
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 7:10 AM Kamil Breguła
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020, 03:48 Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jarek Potiuk
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Kind ping again :).
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, May 23, 2020, 03:48 Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
> > Kind ping again :). The time is nearly up!
> >
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:44 AM Jarek Potiuk
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just a kind ping - Looking forward
+1 (binding)
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Kind ping again :). The time is nearly up!
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:44 AM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
> > Just a kind ping - Looking forward to some more testing and voting :).
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:15 PM Jarek
Kind ping again :). The time is nearly up!
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:44 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Just a kind ping - Looking forward to some more testing and voting :).
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:15 PM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have cut Airflow Backport Providers
Just a kind ping - Looking forward to some more testing and voting :).
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:15 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have cut Airflow Backport Providers 2020.5.20rc2. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will
Hey all,
I have cut Airflow Backport Providers 2020.5.20rc2. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Fri May
22 18:15:00 CEST 2020.
The main differences from RC1 are (Thanks Ash for those comments and
suggestions. it's
the first
14 matches
Mail list logo
