Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

+1 (binding) On Sunday, February 18, 2024, Elad Kalif wrote: > provider cncf.kubernetes will be excluded from this release > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 11:32 AM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > -1 (non-binding) for apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc2/ > > < > > https://pypi.org/project/a

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

provider cncf.kubernetes will be excluded from this release On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 11:32 AM Pankaj Koti wrote: > -1 (non-binding) for apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc2/ > < > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc2/ > > > The happy cases are wo

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

-1 (non-binding) for apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc2/ The happy cases are working fine for cncf k8s, however, I am observing an issue with the recent modifications to KPO included in the RC, where after

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

+1 (binding) Verify signatures, checksums, files On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 11:09, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). Checked my changes, Verified reproducibility, signatures, > licences, checksums, all looks good. > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:10 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

+1 (binding). Checked my changes, Verified reproducibility, signatures, licences, checksums, all looks good. On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:10 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 9:37 AM, Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested both providers with our examp

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

+1 non binding On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 9:37 AM, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested both providers with our example DAGs without encountering an error. > Verified #36330 > Best, > > Wei > > > > On Feb 17, 2024, at 5:51 PM, ayaan rayan > wro

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Tested both providers with our example DAGs without encountering an error. Verified #36330 Best, Wei > On Feb 17, 2024, at 5:51 PM, ayaan rayan wrote: > > ‫بتاریخ ہفتہ، 17 فروری، 2024 بوقت 1:22 PM‏ ‪Elad Kalif‬‏ > <‪elad...@apac

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

‫بتاریخ ہفتہ، 17 فروری، 2024 بوقت 1:22 PM‏ ‪Elad Kalif‬‏ <‪elad...@apache.org‬‏> نے لکھا:‬ > > Hey all, > > I have just cut the RC2/RC3 wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on February > 18, 2

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 17, 2024

Hey all, I have just cut the RC2/RC3 wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on February 18, 2024 08:20 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Vote duration is according to a shorte