Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Elad Kalif
Vote is now closed. Result vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/g1ckn7qc2f4fcntqrt8noj4whc2b86ow Thank you everyone. On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:35 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Jed Cunningham
+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Akash Sharma
+1 (non binding) tested few example dags. Best regards, Akash On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, 19:40 Vincent Beck, wrote: > +1 (non-binding). I ran successfully my testing DAGs from Amazon provider > package > > On 2023/07/10 10:17:29 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > +1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Vincent Beck
+1 (non-binding). I ran successfully my testing DAGs from Amazon provider package On 2023/07/10 10:17:29 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences, checksums, compared the > sources with the ones in the repository (both in whl and sdist). > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:28 

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) - Checked signatures, licences, checksums, compared the sources with the ones in the repository (both in whl and sdist). On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:28 AM Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > tested my changes > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Pankaj Singh
+1 (non-binding) tested my changes On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested without example amazon DAGs without encountering issues. > > Best, > Wei > > > > On Jul 10, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Our Amazon

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Wei Lee
+1 (non-binding) Tested without example amazon DAGs without encountering issues. Best, Wei > On Jul 10, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Our Amazon example DAGs ran fine with this RC. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-10 Thread Pankaj Koti
+1 (non-binding) Our Amazon example DAGs ran fine with this RC. Regards, Pankaj Koti *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. Location: Pune, India Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io Mobile: +91 9730079985 On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 1:08 AM

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-09 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (non-binding) I've tested my changes and executed some testing dags. On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 6:28 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all,I have just cut *RC4* ad hoc Airflow Providers packages. This > email is calling a vote on the release,which will last for *24 hours* > - which means that it will

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

2023-07-09 Thread Elad Kalif
Hey all,I have just cut *RC4* ad hoc Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release,which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on July 10, 2023 04:30 PM UTC (according to shortened voting period policy as accepted in this thread