Cancelled: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-24 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
The issue Jarek pointed out is a blocker for releasing https://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#license-headers. We will add those missing license headers and make an RC 2 with no other changes (i.e. we won't include the commits already on v1-10-test after RC1) so the next vote should be a

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-24 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1. binding Works fine for me as well. Python3.6 with example DAGs. I noticed a few small issues for the source package but they are likely not blocking (please confirm, it's the first time I am looking into it as PMC): - breeze-complete has no licence (RAT 0.13 detected it - will switch to

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-24 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
+1 binding. - Ran an example DAG with the local executor under Python 3.7. - Checked the sha hashes: MacBook-Pro-van-Fokko:Downloads fokkodriesprong$ shasum -a 512 apache-airflow-1.10.6rc1-bin.tar.gz a4bde283b3f32fbc7a603da6deb3f015bda470b3dba1934a40b72212eba5391a9365400b8595d61afd27b2f8b6d9be220

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-24 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
Hi all, Works fine for me, +1 (non-binding) Tested on python 3.6 with postgres, run few GCP examples and some examples DAGs from UI. Bests, Tomek On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:34 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) - tested on Py 3.7.3 with example DAGs > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:30 AM Ash Be

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-21 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 (binding) - tested on Py 3.7.3 with example DAGs On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > I did all my testing of the RC on 3.7.3 so the bits I testee (core mostly, > didn't test many operators) work > > On 19 October 2019 07:56:40 BST, Jarek Potiuk > wrote: > >It is state

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-19 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
I did all my testing of the RC on 3.7.3 so the bits I testee (core mostly, didn't test many operators) work On 19 October 2019 07:56:40 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >It is stated in CONTRIBUTING.md (for v1-10) and CONTRIBUTING.rst (in >master) - we are working on improving those docs. But indeed it

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
It is stated in CONTRIBUTING.md (for v1-10) and CONTRIBUTING.rst (in master) - we are working on improving those docs. But indeed it should be stated in the user documentation :). I will make sure to include that in our Google Season of Docs initiative. Yes. It is quite possible to add 3.7 support

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-18 Thread Kevin Yang
Thank you Jarek for the clarification, that make sense! I might be ignorant but do we have an official place stating the python version we support? People might not be keep tracking of the Python version in CI and use breeze doc as a reference. Do you think it make sense to update breeze doc to ref

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
This is really what's intended. 1.10 supports officialy 2.7/3.5/3.6. See for example here where we do not test against 3.7 https://travis-ci.org/apache/airflow/builds/599638353 On the other hand 2.0.*/master should support 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 (and we test against all those versions): for example here -

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-18 Thread Kevin Yang
Just started to play with it for a bit and seems like we got a small bit inconsistency between what version of python breeze supports. The code would allow only `2.7, 3.5, 3.6` but we claim we support `3.5, 3.6, 3.7`

[VOTE] Release 1.10.6 from 1.10.6rc1

2019-10-18 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
Hey all, I have cut Airflow 1.10.6 RC1. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 96 hours, until Tuesday, October 22nd at 14:30 UTC. (Sorry this is mostly over the weekend again, I've extended the vote by one day to give two working days to test.) Consider this my (bin