[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-25 Thread Jed Cunningham
Hello, Apache Airflow 2.8.4 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 4 "+1" binding votes received: - Jed Cunningham - Jarek Potiuk - Hussein Awala - Andrey Anshin 3 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Rahul Vats - Amogh Desai - Wei Lee Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-25 Thread Jed Cunningham
Hey Andrey, If you reimport from KEYS, I've already updated the expiration date a while back :). But yes, that would be problematic otherwise. Jed On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:41 AM Andrey Anshin wrote: > +1 binding > > Checked files, licences, signatures and also my changes. > > One small nit

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-25 Thread Wei Lee
+1 (non-binding) Ran a few example DAGs and worked fine. Best, Wei > On Mar 25, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Amogh Desai wrote: > > +1 non binding > > Verified my changes, and ran a few example DAGs. I see no regressions. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 8:11 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-25 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding Verified my changes, and ran a few example DAGs. I see no regressions. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 8:11 PM Andrey Anshin wrote: > +1 binding > > Checked files, licences, signatures and also my changes. > > One small nit that I've found is that the key

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-23 Thread Andrey Anshin
+1 binding Checked files, licences, signatures and also my changes. One small nit that I've found is that the key which is used for sign releases is expired, I'm not sure if it should be considered as a showstopper. ❯ gpg --verify apache_airflow-2.8.4-py3-none-any.whl.asc

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-22 Thread Rahul Vats
+1 (non-binding) Verified running our regression DAGS and API tests. LGTM Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:24, Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) checked licences, checksums, signatures, and source codes, and > ran some testing dags. All looks good. > > On Wed, Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-22 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding) checked licences, checksums, signatures, and source codes, and ran some testing dags. All looks good. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:54 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - tested / verified all changes I was involved (either as > fixer, bug introducer or both, particularly when

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-20 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) - tested / verified all changes I was involved (either as fixer, bug introducer or both, particularly when both), verified reproducibility, licences, checksums, signatures, run a few DAGs - all looks good. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:56 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hey fellow

[VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

2024-03-20 Thread Jed Cunningham
Hey fellow Airflowers, I have cut Airflow 2.8.4rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last at least 72 hours, from Wednesday, March 20, 2024 at 4:00 pm UTC until Saturday, March 23, 2024 at 4:00 pm UTC, and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.