Hey fellow Airflowers,
A bug was found in rc2 that'll necessitate an rc3. I'm canceling this vote
and will create 2.9.0rc3 soon.
- Ephraim
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 19:05, Rahul Vats wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
>- Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any regressions.
>-
+1 (non-binding).
- Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any regressions.
- Verified logical Operators for dataset conditional logic (#37101).
- Verified the implementation of AIP-58: Add object storage backend for
xcom.
- Verified - Add task log grouping to UI
+1 binding
Deployed here no issues found.
Bolke
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 Apr 2024, at 19:02, Jed Cunningham wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the
> helm chart with a few different configs. All looks good!
+1 (binding)
Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the
helm chart with a few different configs. All looks good!
+1 non binding
Tested a few example DAGs and tested to see if my changes work as expected.
It looks good to me.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:04 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences - >
> all good. Installed
+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences - >
all good. Installed it, run a few dags, clicked through a number of
screens. All looks good. Also verified the final package and it looks good
with the right FAB >=1.0.2 dependency. All looks good.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.9.0rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last at least 52 hours, from Thursday, April 4, 2024, at 9:00 pm
UTC
until Sunday, April 7, 2024, at 1:00 am UTC
