Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-08-01 Thread Jarek Potiuk
The vote is concluded. Unanimous decision on a) - we are not going to pre-install the daskexecutor, celery, cncf.kubernetes providers. Binding votes: 9 (a) Jarek Potiuk, Ash Berlin-Taylor, Hussein Awala, Pierre Jeambrun, Vincent Beck, Jed Cunningham, Dennis Ferruzzi, Vikram Koka, Elad Kalif Non

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-08-01 Thread Elad Kalif
I also vote for [a] On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > I am a little torn on this, but with the separation already in place, I > would also vote for option (a). > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:48 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis > wrote: > > > Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-31 Thread Vikram Koka
I am a little torn on this, but with the separation already in place, I would also vote for option (a). On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:48 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis wrote: > Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be > executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-31 Thread Ferruzzi, Dennis
Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense to me. - ferruzzi From: Jed Cunningham Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 9:39 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-31 Thread Jed Cunningham
I'm also in favor of option a.

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-31 Thread Beck, Vincent
I vote for a On 2023-07-30, 12:24 AM, "Amogh Desai" mailto:amoghdesai@gmail.com>> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. I also think that these

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Amogh Desai
I also think that these operators should not be pre installed. I vote for option (a) Thanks, Amogh Desai On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 09:22 rahul Vats wrote: > Option a, > > > Regards , > Rahul Vats > > On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, wrote: > > > [a] the providers to be regular ones, not

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread rahul Vats
Option a, Regards , Rahul Vats On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, wrote: > [a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi > wrote: > > > > option a (non-binding) > > > > -- > > Sent from Canary

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Wei Lee
[a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding) Best, Wei > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi > wrote: > > option a (non-binding) > > -- > Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io) > >> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun > (mailto:pierrejb...@gmail.com)>

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Avi
option a (non-binding) -- Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io) > On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun (mailto:pierrejb...@gmail.com)> wrote: > Option a > > On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > I vote for option a > > > > On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Pierre Jeambrun
Option a On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala wrote: > I vote for option a > > On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > Option a. > > > > _ash > > > > On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > >Hello everyone, > > > > > >I would like to resume the vote

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Hussein Awala
I vote for option a On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Option a. > > _ash > > On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >Hello everyone, > > > >I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should > >pre-install or not the three providers

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
Option a. _ash On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should >pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors. > >Most of the discussion happened in

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Pankaj Koti
[a] (non-binding) Regards, Pankaj Koti *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. Location: Pune, India Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io Mobile: +91 9730079985 On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 11:55 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Collin McNulty
I vote for a. Non-binding.

[VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

2023-07-29 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors. Most of the discussion happened in https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6 [DISCUSS} and