>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pypistats.org/packages/apache-airflow), but I
> > >>>>&
>>>>>> https://pypistats.org/packages/apache-airflow), but I
> >>>>>> think they
> >>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> kind
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
, but I
>>>>>> think they
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> kind
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of indicative numbers for potential users of 2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They sh
hat matter for
> > > > >Airflow:
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > > - Formatted string literals :
> > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >
> > >
> >
t;>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#pep-498-formatted-string-literals
> > >>>
pep-498-formatted-string-literals
> >>> > > > > > (my
> >>> > > > > > favourite one)
> >>> > > > > > - Type annotations for variables :
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > &
t;>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#pep-526-syntax-for-variable-annotations
>>> > > > > > -
>>> > > >
ly
>> > > > > > place we
>> > > > > > have to leave ugly comments rather than annotations.
>> > > > > > - Path-like types:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>&
cs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#pep-519-adding-a-file-system-path-protocol
> > > > > > -
> > > > > >nicer handling of file access
> > > > > >- Local Time disambiguation:
> > > > > >
> > >
; > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#pep-519-adding-a-file-system-path-protocol
> > > > > -
> > > > >nicer handling of file access
> > > > >- Local Time disambiguation:
&
;nicer handling of file access
> > > >- Local Time disambiguation:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#pep-495-local-time-disambiguation
> > > > -
> > > > this had already caus
#pep-495-local-time-disambiguation
> > > -
> > >this had already caused problems in the past (I fixed a problem
> where
> > >pendulum and datetime objects were mixed and caused wrong behaviour
> on
> > > 3.5)
> > >- Json loads supports binary f
ts were mixed and caused wrong behaviour on
> > 3.5)
> >- Json loads supports binary format -
> >https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html#json - this has already
> >bitten us as well. there was code working fine in py2.7 and 3.6 but
> not
> > wor
GitLab
> fix will be out in 10 days or so and we will be able to start testing
> migration to it).
>
> J..
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:00 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Can we drop python 3.5 support and switch to 3.6 as a minimum?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bolke
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
ll be out in 10 days or so and we will be able to start testing
migration to it).
J..
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:00 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we drop python 3.5 support and switch to 3.6 as a minimum?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
--
Jarek Potiuk
Polide
+1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019, 1:00 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we drop python 3.5 support and switch to 3.6 as a minimum?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
Hi All,
Can we drop python 3.5 support and switch to 3.6 as a minimum?
Cheers
Bolke
18 matches
Mail list logo
