Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-25 Thread Jarek Potiuk
(Elad asked me to take over from here as he is flying tonight) I am cancelling this vote due to the problem found by Andrey - https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36948#issuecomment-1909664795 - the problem is that the way logger_name passing and **kwargs handling, there was a potential of

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Pankaj Singh
+1 (non-binding). ran some tests for amazon,google,ftp,snowflake,databricks,openlineage,mysql providers. On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 4:17 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) checked binary reproduction, licences, signatures, and > checksums. > > On my system the binary reproduction check for

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Jed Cunningham
+1 (binding) checked binary reproduction, licences, signatures, and checksums. On my system the binary reproduction check for the source tarball did fail, but I spot verified the tarball contents are correct. I'm still investigating, but no reason to hold the release for this.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding) checked source code, licences, signatures, and checksums and tested my changes; all look good. On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:22 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > +1 non-binding > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, 8:02 PM Utkarsh Sharma > wrote: > > > +1 Non-binding. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Aritra Basu
+1 non-binding -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, 8:02 PM Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > +1 Non-binding. > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:11 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:48 rom sharon, wrote: > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Utkarsh Sharma
+1 Non-binding. Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:11 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:48 rom sharon, wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת ‪Rahul Vats‬‏ <‪ > > rah.sharm...@gmail.com‬‏>:‬ > > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Pankaj Koti
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 13:48 rom sharon, wrote: > +1 non-binding > > ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת ‪Rahul Vats‬‏ <‪ > rah.sharm...@gmail.com‬‏>:‬ > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Verified below providers with our example DAGS. > > > >-

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Wei Lee
+1 non-binding Tested my changes and example DAGs without encountering errors. Best, Wei > On Jan 24, 2024, at 4:18 PM, rom sharon wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת ‪Rahul Vats‬‏ <‪ > rah.sharm...@gmail.com‬‏>:‬ > >> +1 non-binding >> >> Verified below

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread rom sharon
+1 non-binding ‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 24 בינו׳ 2024 ב-10:17 מאת ‪Rahul Vats‬‏ <‪ rah.sharm...@gmail.com‬‏>:‬ > +1 non-binding > > Verified below providers with our example DAGS. > >- apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.17.0rc1 >- apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive==6.5.0rc1 >-

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-24 Thread Rahul Vats
+1 non-binding Verified below providers with our example DAGS. - apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.17.0rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive==6.5.0rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.11.0rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-databricks==6.1.0rc1 -

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-23 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding Tested some example dags in CNCF provider and Hive Provider. Looks good! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:44 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - tested my changes, checked binary reproducibility, licences, > signatures, checksums - all looks good. > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) - tested my changes, checked binary reproducibility, licences, signatures, checksums - all looks good. On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:11 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which