+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:21 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021, 20:11 wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> śr., 5 maj 2021 o 20:59 Tomasz Urbaszek
>> napisał(a):
>> >
>> > +1, checked checksums, signatures and licenses
>> >
>> > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 20:50,
+1 (non-binding)
Ran the binary chart through a number of scenarios (CeleryExecutor,
KubernetesExecutor, persistence, pgbouncer, gitsync) with a sample DAG and
everything looked good.
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 2:32 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Huge +1 from me.
>
> Thanks Kaxil for addressing ALL my
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 3:50 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> +1 (binding) because I didn't actually cast it yet :D
>
> I think since the CeleryKubernetesExecutor behaviour is not a regression
> from 2.1.0, combined with Kaxil finding a workaround that it is worth
> carrying on
+1 (non-binding).
Ran through some simple scenarios with LocalExecutor and KubernetesExecutor.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:04 AM Daniel Imberman
wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:31 AM, Elad Kalif wrote:
>
> +1 non binding
> tested on several of my dags
>
> On Mon, Apr 19,
Hi Alexander,
There has been some discussion around multi-tenancy this week actually and
a call has been scheduled next week to discuss it further!
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r94991343d4fe536d58a4e5097edde378e7c0db76b95bf73008430820%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
Just want to make
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:27 AM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:06 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>> calling a vote on the release,
>> which will last for 72 hours
Congrats Brent
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:16 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
wrote:
> Congrats Brent!
Congrats Ephraim and Elad!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:02 AM gabrielleebuaa
wrote:
> Congrats
> Replied Message
> From Jarek Potiuk
> Date 08/31/2021 21:43
> To dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject Re: New PMC Members: Ephraim Anierobi & Elad Kalif
> VERY WELL DESERVED! Congrats!
>
+1 (non-binding)
Gave it a spin in a fresh install and with the helm chart. Only issue I ran
into was the find command in the log groomer (
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17739), but that's already fixed and
won't be an issue.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:34 PM Xiaodong Deng wrote:
> +1
+1 (non-binding) - tested the image with the helm chart and a fresh install
in a virtualenv with a (small) variety of DAGs
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1(binding) Verified some issues
>
>
>
> *From: *Jarek Potiuk
> *Sent: *Sunday, September 12, 2021 10:39 AM
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> +1 binding - signatures, sums, licences all work. I run it with some
> example dags and it looks generally OK.
>
> I have not run detailed tests for all cases but I checked #18504. The
> cached (not real problem
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:29 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 11:02 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> * Verified licences, signatures, shasums. I corrected a minor problem
>> with sha512sum files (they were containing "dist/"
Let's try again since we lost some newlines:
Hello Apache Airflow Community,
This is a call for the vote to release Helm Chart version 1.2.0.
Consider this my (non-binding) +1. As I’m not a member of the PMC, Kaxil
signed the distribution.
The release candidate is available at:
Hello Apache Airflow Community,
This is a call for the vote to release Helm Chart version 1.2.0.
Consider this my (non-binding) +1. As I’m not a member of the PMC, Kaxil
signed the distribution.
The release candidate is available
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.2.0 (based on RC1) has been accepted.
5 “+1” binding votes received:
- Ash Berlin-Taylor
- Elad Kalif
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Kaxil Naik
- Jarek Potiuk
3 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Jed Cunningham
- Bas Harenslak
- Dennis Akpenyi
Vote
th
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.2.0 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.0 RC1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours,
from Friday, October 8, 2021 at 4:00 pm UTC until Monday, October 11, 2021
at 4:00 pm UTC
Hello all,
The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.2.0 based on
1.2.0rc1 is now closed.
The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 1 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes:
"+1" Binding votes:
- Jarek Potiuk
- Kaxil Naik
- Ephraim Anierobi
&qu
Friendly reminder that this needs more PMC votes.
Dear Airflow community,
I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart
1.2.0
The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are
available:
Official Sources:
Let's try the changelog link again :)
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/helm-chart/1.2.0/changelog.html
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:48 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 8:20 PM Josh Fell
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> Verified a few bug fixes and regression tested with a variety of DAGs.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>>
Hey fellow Airflowers,
We have cut Airflow 2.2.0beta2 with more new features and bug fixes.
This "snapshot" is intended for members of the Airflow developer community
to test the build and allow early testing of 2.2.0. Please test this beta
and create GitHub issues wherever possible if you
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.1rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours, from Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 21:45 pm UTC
until Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 21:45 pm UTC, or until 3 binding +1
votes have been received.
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.2.3 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
3 “+1” binding votes received:
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Jarek Potiuk
- Kaxil Naik
2 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Jed Cunningham
- Josh Fell
Vote thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread/sp9ptd2l8dr66nnqxovzn9tjv4h1
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.2.3 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
+1 (non-binding)
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.2.2 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
3 “+1” binding votes received:
- Kaxil Naik
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Jarek Potiuk
5 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Daniel Standish
- Leon Smith
- Josh Fell
- Robin Edwards
- Jed Cunningham
Vote thread:https://lists.apache.
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.2.2 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.2.2/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:08 AM Daniel Imberman
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping:
>
> AIP-42: Dynamic Task Mapping - Airflow - Apache Software Foundation
>
che/airflow/issues/19519
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Jed Cunningham wrote:
>
> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>
> I have cut Airflow 2.2.2rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, October 9, 2021 at 22:30 UTC
> until Friday,
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.1rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, October 26, 2021 at 15:45 UTC
until Friday, October 29, 2021 at 15:45 UTC, or until 3 binding +1 votes
have been received.
A bug was found in rc1 that'll necessitate an rc2. I'm canceling this vote
and will create 2.2.1rc2 soon.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:51 PM Jed Cunningham wrote:
> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>
> I have cut Airflow 2.2.1rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
> which will last
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.2.1 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.2.1 (based on RC2) has been accepted.
5 “+1” binding votes received:
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Kamil Breguła
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Kaxil Naik
7 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Jed Cunningham
- Kristen Malik
- Drew Hubl
- Dennis Akpenyi
- Josh Fell
-
Dear Airflow community,
I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart
1.3.0
The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are
available:
Official Sources:
- Kamil Breguła
"+1" Non-Binding votes:
- Jed Cunningham
- Daniel Standish
Vote thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread/6h6g83k1rvnqphrjjoyvdbgdfhb7zls4
I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement
will follow shortly.
Thanks,
Jed
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.2rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, October 9, 2021 at 22:30 UTC
until Friday, October 12, 2021 at 22:30 UTC, or until 3 binding +1 votes
have been received.
Hello Apache Airflow Community,
This is a call for the vote to release Helm Chart version 1.3.0.
The release candidate is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/helm-chart/1.3.0rc1/
*airflow-chart-1.3.0-source.tar.gz* - is the "main source release" that
comes with INSTALL
As for UPDATING only being on github, I have a separate proposal in that
area coming soon. It likely won't be an issue come time to release 2.3.0 .
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> And I agree with you :) (but with a twist).
>
> I do not say we should remove "UPDATING.md"
I personally think the docs on deferrable are already comprehensive enough.
I'll add more to UPDATING and the smart sensors docs to help guide users,
however.
Also, keep in mind:
- smart sensors are disabled by default
- the only sensor Airflow ships with smart sensor support enabled by
default
and "What should I
>> do now?" - thinking from our poor users' perspective - who have no
>> time to read the docs - takes almost no time. Linking to it from the
>> error message - also simple.
>> This might prevent some questions from our users. So why not do it?
Hello everyone!
Smart Sensors, an early-access feature that was added in Airflow 2, have
been superseded by Deferrable Operators added in Airflow 2.2.0.
Kaxil and I propose we deprecate smart sensors in Airflow 2.3.0, and remove
them in Airflow 2.4.0. I've opened a PR with these changes:
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.3rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours, from Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 23:45 UTC
until Friday, December 17, 2021 at 23:45 UTC, or until 3 binding +1 votes
have been received.
+1 (non-binding)
Ran through a few tests and all looks good.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Checked signatures, shasums, licences - all look good.
> * Used the binary package to install airflow in my local K8S cluster and
> run a few basic tests with
Hello all,
The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.4.0 based on
1.4.0rc1 is now closed.
The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes:
"+1" Binding votes:
- Jed Cunningham
- Kaxil Naik
- Kamil Breguła
Vote thread:h
I'm proposing some changes in how we release our changelog and updating
docs, starting with core Airflow and the helm chart. After a while, if we
are happy with the changes, these could also be applied to the providers.
First is combining the changelog and updating docs into a single "release
Good points Jarek. I mentioned it in the initial email, but I think we
should keep it optional to start with. I'd rather get the basics in place
first, as I think we are going to find some interesting scenarios as we try
and put rules around it. Even if only release managers touch it in the
short
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
Hey Leah,
Part of my goal was to leave the "end result" substantially unchanged,
except for our existing changelog and updating guide being combined
together. For example, compare 2.2.4:
New:
Thanks Kaxil!
Here is a specific example from pip, a bugfix in 22.0.3 (note the file
added to `news`):
https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/10869/files
Which is moved from that news file to NEWS.rst here during release (note
the `news` deletions):
Hey fellow Airflowers,
I have cut Airflow 2.2.4rc1. This email is calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours, from Friday, February 18, 2022 at 2:00 pm UTC
until Monday, February 21, 2022 at 2:00 pm UTC, or until 3 binding +1 votes
have been received.
+1 (Binding)
Verified licenses, signatures, and checksums.
+1 (binding)
Verified signatures (though I signed them), licenses, and checksums. Ran
through a couple installs with different config and ran a DAG.
+1 (Binding)
Verified licenses, signatures, and checksums.
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.2.4 (based on RC1) has been accepted.
3 “+1” binding votes received:
- Jed Cunningham
- Kaxil Naik
- Ephraim Anierobi
Vote thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread/pgxczr9qdnfqptxg7k6op518l0yk429z
I'll continue with the release process, and the release announcement
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.2.4 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
+1 (binding)
I gave it a spin in the helm chart.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:21 AM Josh Fell
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified a few bug fixes, ran some DAGs using core modules.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:37 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding) - checked signatures, licences,
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
+1 (binding)
ines.
$ helm verify airflow-1.4.0.tgz --keyring ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg
Signed by: Jed Cunningham
Using Key With Fingerprint: A020DD3634F1A4D126A1C5547774A4E590CB0351
Chart Hash Verified:
sha256:b33eac716e0416a18af89fb4fa1043fcfcf24f9f903cda3912729815213525df
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
If you'd like to test with the Kubernetes provider, you'll have to install
it with this command:
pip install --upgrade apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==4.0.0
--no-deps
pip doesn't like the combination of `>= 2.3.0` on the provider and
`2.3.0b1` in this snapshot.
Here is a link to the dev docs for the new Dynamic Task Mapping feature
(AIP-42):
http://apache-airflow-docs.s3-website.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/docs/apache-airflow/latest/concepts/dynamic-task-mapping.html
I forgot to mention, the docker images will have version 4.0.0 of the
Kubernetes provider preinstalled, so you only need to worry about it if you
are installing from PyPI/wheel/src.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:07 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> If you'd like to test with the Kubernetes provi
t implementing automation in CI as a trade-off
> between:
> > >>
> > >> * automating intentions of what we want to do (and teach people to
> > >> react to errors)
> > >>
> > >> vs.
> > >>
> > >> * explain
+1 binding
I also don't like the 10 minute thing. I'd rather we remove it, or display
a message like we do sequential executor (we can only do so much, this is
as visible as we can make it really), I think in that order?
Shubham touched on it a bit, but I want to bring providers into the fold a
bit as well. I don't think there is enough focus on provider versions. Us
maintainers of Airflow have greatly benefited from being able to have
breaking provider changes, but I always get the impression the average user
1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, licences
+1 (binding)
I'm slightly embarrassed I forgot about 34729, but yeah changing my vote to
that as well. Now (at least so far) it's unanimous :)
The new OpenSearch provider gets my vote - 34705.
Just to clarify, I didn't mean we should highlight multiple PRs every
month. In that month none of @eumiro's PRs were individually enough to be
highlighted but in bulk they were. That was an unusual situation though.
I think we should be flexible with it. I'm not opposed to having multiple
per
A bug was found in rc1 that'll necessitate an rc2. I'm canceling this vote
and will create 1.11.0rc2 soon.
delines.
$ helm gpg verify airflow-1.11.0.tgz
gpg: Signature made Sat Sep 30 11:45:11 2023 MDT
gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E
gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org"
gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham "
[ulti
Hello all,
The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.11.0 based on
1.11.0rc2 is now closed.
The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 2 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes:
"+1" Binding votes:
- Jed Cunningham
- Hussein Awala
- Daniel Stan
Dear Airflow community,
I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart
1.11.0
The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are
available:
Official Sources:
nes.
gpg: Signature made Wed Sep 27 17:24:14 2023 MDT
gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E
gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org"
gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham "
[ultim
> the `Chart.yaml` file which does not have a license
Quirk of helm ultimately. The source tarball does have the license, just
the convenience package tarball is missing it - helm processes the file and
removes the comment when it packages the chart. It's been this way forever
unfortunately.
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with the
helm chart with a few different configs
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with the
helm chart with a few different configs
My vote is for a batch of PRs, not just a single one (which would have been
impossible to review if they were all combined) - the refactoring work
@eumiro has been doing recently. He's done 69 this month already!
y we land somewhere in between.
>
> As long as we are aware of the potential issues and we take a
> conscious decision that we want to (and will have capacity) to deal
> with them when they start - this is cool.
>
> J.
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:18 PM Jed Cunningha
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
.
$ helm gpg verify airflow-1.6.0.tgz
gpg: Signature made Tue May 17 12:29:32 2022 MDT
gpg:using RSA key E1A1E984F55B8F280BD9CBA20BB7163892A2E48E
gpg:issuer "jedcunning...@apache.org"
gpg: Good signature from "Jed Cunningham "
[ulti
Dear Airflow community,
I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart
1.6.0
The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are
available:
Official Sources:
Hello all,
The vote to release Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.6.0 based on
1.6.0rc2 is now closed.
The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1", 1 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes:
"+1" Binding votes:
- Jed Cunningham
- Jarek Potiuk
- Ash Berlin-Tay
Thanks Ping. This was a miss in one of my optimizations. PR here, if you'd
like to test it as well: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/24059
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:51 PM Ping Zhang wrote:
> It looks like the grid view is broken for me. Please see this gist for
> more info:
>
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
I'm looking forward to this, thanks Ash.
graded cleanly - no surprises. ran some dags. 2.3.0 is default. I still
> love the new Grid UI.
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:29 PM Ephraim Anierobi
> wrote:
>
>> +1(binding) Verified signatures, licensees, checksums and also ran some
>> dags
>>
>>
+1 (binding)
Checked signatures, checksums, and licences.
Sorry Jarek, I was gone for a few days.
+1 (binding) - checked sigs, licenses, and checksums
Overall this sounds good to me. I'll echo waiting until after the last
planned 2.3 release. It'd be great if we could keep the empty inits empty
(and it sounds like isort will do that for us .
+1 (binding)
Gave it a quick spin with the helm chart.
My write in is 24249, which adds viewing task logs in the new Grid UI:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/24249
If we are doing this rank choice style, my next choice would be 24496.
+1 for removing it.
+1 (binding) - tested with the helm chart.
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
