+0 (non-binding)
Best,
Wei
> On Feb 8, 2024, at 11:15 PM, Elad Kalif wrote:
>
> I'm -0 (binding)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 10:51 AM Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 13:30 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
>>
>>> Since this is a
Hello everyone,
Summary of the vote in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/5m45dz860ovg4zyvrqscz8m1mnmmrn1g
5 binding (+1) votes:
* Jarek Potiuk
* Amogh Desai
* Pankaj Koti
* Jens Scheffer
* Hussein Awala
2 binding (-1) votes:
* Bolke de Bruin
* Ash Berlin-Taylor
1 binding (-0.5) votes:
* Jed
I'm -0 (binding)
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 10:51 AM Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 13:30 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
>
> > Since this is a controversial topic, just a kind reminder - the voting
> ends
> > today in ~ 8 hrs. If you feel (even
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 13:30 Jarek Potiuk, wrote:
> Since this is a controversial topic, just a kind reminder - the voting ends
> today in ~ 8 hrs. If you feel (even somewhat) strongly about either
> direction - that's the last time to cast the vote.
>
> And yes - fractional votes
Since this is a controversial topic, just a kind reminder - the voting ends
today in ~ 8 hrs. If you feel (even somewhat) strongly about either
direction - that's the last time to cast the vote.
And yes - fractional votes are possible :) - see
Love the vote from @Jed Cunningham here!
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:05 AM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> -0.5
>
-0.5
) <
> jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 binding
> >>
> >> Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> >>
> >> From: Pankaj Koti
> >> Sent: Monday, February
ms/o0ukef>
>>
>> From: Pankaj Koti
>> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 3:36:41 PM
>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as
>> permanent solution
>
uary 5, 2024 3:36:41 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as
> permanent solution
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Pankaj Koti*
> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team
+1 binding
Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Pankaj Koti
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 3:36:41 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] "Require conversation resolution" setting in PRs as
permanent solution
+1
+1 (non-binding) from me based on my past comments on the thread.
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 8:07 PM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Pankaj Koti*
> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
>
+1 (binding)
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:05 PM Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 from me too based on my earlier points.
>
>
+1 from me too based on my earlier points.
Wondering if we can make it a little more rigid to address the concerns
about hiding comments
from the email thread earlier
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:47 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing and
Hello,
We have been discussing and arguing and it seems that we do not have a
consensus of whether "require conversation resolution" is a good idea, as
promised I am casting a VOTE on it.
The discussion is in this thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/bzg00p8yolboqgwlwfnlkdfvnn996601
Voting
15 matches
Mail list logo
