Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-27 Thread Jakob Homan
Sent out a call to arms... -jg On 27 December 2017 at 10:22, Sid Anand wrote: > Ugh... you're right. Hmn... what about our other 2 mentors? > > -s > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > >> Did you count 3? I only counted 2? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 27 Dec 2017

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-27 Thread Sid Anand
Ugh... you're right. Hmn... what about our other 2 mentors? -s On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Did you count 3? I only counted 2? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand wrote: > > > > I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IP

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-27 Thread Bolke de Bruin
Did you count 3? I only counted 2? Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand wrote: > > I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members). Per > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't that > be sufficient? > > In the podling re

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-26 Thread Sid Anand
I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members). Per https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't that be sufficient? In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or still working toward it? -s On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM,

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-19 Thread Chris Riccomini
I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a new RC. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Chris, > > Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter > peop

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-19 Thread Bolke de Bruin
Chris, Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter people have issues with it. Cheers, Bolke. > On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > Thanks to all for helping validate it. :) > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor < > ash_airflowl..

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-18 Thread Chris Riccomini
Thanks to all for helping validate it. :) On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor < ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote: > Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all > the RCs. > > -ash > > > On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > > > Hel

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-18 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all the RCs. -ash > On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > Hello, > > Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted. > > 5 “+1” binding votes received: > > - Maxime Beauchemin (binding) >

[RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

2017-12-18 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hello, Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted. 5 “+1” binding votes received: - Maxime Beauchemin (binding) - Chris Riccomini (binding) - Bolke de Bruin (binding) - Joy Gao (binding) - Fokko Driesprong (binding) My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC. Cheers