Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Eric Yang
> > Cc: Sumit Mohanty , Alejandro Fernandez < > > afernan...@hortonworks.com> > > Subject: Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question. > > > > Thank you very much Robert for the detailed explanation. It helps > > to understand the background. > > > > Re

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Bhuvnesh Chaudhary
t; afernan...@hortonworks.com> > Subject: Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question. > > Thank you very much Robert for the detailed explanation. It helps > to understand the background. > > Regarding HAWQ to capitalize on retry: We can potentially do some > tweaks to verify if HAWQ

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Alejandro Fernandez
ez mailto:afernan...@hortonworks.com>> Subject: Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question. Thank you very much Robert for the detailed explanation. It helps to understand the background. Regarding HAWQ to capitalize on retry: We can potentially do some tweaks to verify if HAWQ has been initial

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Bhuvnesh Chaudhary
Thank you very much Robert for the detailed explanation. It helps to understand the background. Regarding HAWQ to capitalize on retry: We can potentially do some tweaks to verify if HAWQ has been initialized or not according to the current behavior, and change the way of doing init so that it can

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Eric Yang
We have a use case where a service depends on Sqoop, Hive Metastore, HBase Client, Hadoop Client on a worker node. We found that Hadoop Client is sometimes not yet installed when our service installation has already started. This looks like a big problem for our use case. Is there a way to keep

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-14 Thread Robert Nettleton
Hi Bhuvnesh, You are correct. The Blueprints deployment mechanism in Ambari no longer relies on Role-command ordering to install or start components across the cluster. This change to Blueprints was actually implemented in Ambari 2.1.0, so it has been around for several releases now. The new

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-12 Thread Eric Yang
Deploying cluster using blueprint must respect RCO. Otherwise, traditional configuration manager system like chef and puppet can already do the job of Ambari. The advantage of Ambari over other system is to ensure that cross node service dependencies are generated by dependency description model

Re: Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-11 Thread Alejandro Fernandez
+others who have more insight into BluePrints On 3/11/16, 3:24 PM, "Bhuvnesh Chaudhary" wrote: >Hello Sebastian, Alejandro, Andrew, > >Referring to the discussion on RB: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43948 >, it appears that while >deploying clust

Blueprints - RCO - Related question.

2016-03-11 Thread Bhuvnesh Chaudhary
Hello Sebastian, Alejandro, Andrew, Referring to the discussion on RB: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43948 , it appears that while deploying clusters using Blueprints, RCO is not honored. Please confirm if this understanding is correct. While runni