On March 5, 2015, 1:15 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary?
On March 5, 2015, 1:15 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary?
On March 5, 2015, 1:15 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31752/#review75315
---
Why would that make any change? The binary is in PATH and works in
On March 5, 2015, 1:15 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary?
On March 5, 2015, 8:15 a.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary?
On March 5, 2015, 8:15 a.m., Nate Cole wrote:
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an ExecuteSudo or
something that takes the same exact arguments as Execute, but does all this
sudo voodoo.
Agreed; why is the separate script necessary? I even thought that the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31752/#review75325
---
Seems like we should be abstracting somehow - maybe with an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31752/#review75273
---
ambari-common/src/main/python/ambari_commons/constants.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31752/
---
Review request for Ambari, Andrew Onischuk, Jonathan Hurley, Nate Cole, and Sid
10 matches
Mail list logo