Re: Cleanup for ClasspathUtils

Stefan pushed the new cvs head into my project and did the required changes, all well here. thx again, hope to have some time for the testing issue on my platform (and access to a linux as well to be able to spot any difference) thx again... regards, -marc= Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 18 Apr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17973] - A target just like a target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19259] - Ant projects should support "init" and "final" attributes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19259] - Ant projects should support "init" and "final" attributes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19259] New: - Ant projects should support "init" and "final" attributes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: antlib

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > This is exactly the point, we should try to type things. Roles Why ? We have components that can be used in any role. Metadata can be extracted and used in a variety of ways - descriptors, interfaces, runtime calls ( like in the 3 kinds of mbeans ). But in the end

Re: antlib

peter reilly wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2003 17:57, Dominique Devienne wrote: >> Yes, it could be a problem. But running the risk of speaking yet another >> anathema, I'm starting to believe the Jelly approach of using XML >> namespaces is the right one... > +1 > Seems simple to implement and

RE: antlib

Dominique Devienne wrote: > Let's turn around your question: Tell me of a (string) role (beside the > special task/type cases) that would not be an interface? What good a bean > is, if it's not of an expected Java type? What method or field are you > going to use/call on it? Any role. Just like y

RE: antlib

Dominique, you should love the current antlib proposal more of what you are arguing is acomplish there, maybe with a little twist. :-) > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Let's turn around your question: Tell me of a (string) role > (beside the > special task/type cases) th

Re: antlib

Peter Reilly wrote A couple of points: >1) the Project.java in the proposal should be synced up with >the current Project.java. It is quite difficult to see the differences. Yes >2) do the taskdef, typedef tasks still work as at present ? > (ie for individual tasks and with property resouc

RE: antlib

> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > A couple of points: > > 1) the Project.java in the proposal should be synced up with > the current Project.java. It is quite difficult to see > the differences. > Antoine keeps on sync-ing but the thing keeps on moving :-( > 2) do the

Re: antlib

On Monday 21 April 2003 22:23, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > I am trying to update the antlib proposal (proposal/sandbox/antlib). > . . > I would like, based on this email, to read what you find OK and what should > be changed in the antlib proposal. Once I have the comments from everybody > on the

Re: antlib

On Wednesday 23 April 2003 17:57, Dominique Devienne wrote: > Yes, it could be a problem. But running the risk of speaking yet another > anathema, I'm starting to believe the Jelly approach of using XML > namespaces is the right one... +1 Seems simple to implement and fits in with current usage.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18484] - Please add parameters into

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: antlib

Yes, it could be a problem. But running the risk of speaking yet another anathema, I'm starting to believe the Jelly approach of using XML namespaces is the right one... The problem is not so much that one wants to use the same name (say containsregex) for two different things (a condition and a f

Re: antlib

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If everything is defined as a component at a low level, then they >> can be easily introspected to find out what interfaces components >> implement. > > This breaks down if there is no specific interf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19252] New: - does not untar symbolic links properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib

On Wednesday 23 April 2003 17:41, Dominique Devienne wrote: > Let's turn around your question: Tell me of a (string) role (beside the > special task/type cases) that would not be an interface? What good a bean > is, if it's not of an expected Java type? What method or field are you > going to use/c

RE: antlib

Let's turn around your question: Tell me of a (string) role (beside the special task/type cases) that would not be an interface? What good a bean is, if it's not of an expected Java type? What method or field are you going to use/call on it? I agree with Costin, all tasks/types become simply beans

Re: antlib

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forcing roles to map to an interface is probably a *good* idea! Maybe, hmm, probably, not convinced ... > Every single bean would become implicitly a data-type, and the ones > with an execute() method implicitly become tasks. B

RE: antlib

Hi, > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > One comment about roles: Roles are fine, but roles are just > strings... If > everything is defined as a component at a low level, then > they can be easily > introspected to find out what interfaces components > implement. For exam

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

bodewig 2003/04/23 09:01:00 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Keep track of changes Revision ChangesPath 1.403 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v retri

cvs commit: ant/src/script ant.cmd antenv.cmd envset.cmd runrc.cmd

bodewig 2003/04/23 08:57:43 Modified:.build.xml docs/manual install.html running.html runninglist.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Added: src/script ant.cmd antenv.cmd envset.cmd runrc.cmd Log: Improve OS/2 support

RE: antlib

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> With that, do we really need separate and in > >> or are they just special cases of roles? > > > > They should be. > > So if they are just roles, why treat the

RE: antlib

I probably didn't express myself correctly ;-) I didn't say the string role was not necessary, I'm saying it's redundant when the role itself corresponds to an interface. I can implement a single class implementing a bunch of interfaces, each corresponding to a given role, can't I? Plus tasks/typ

Re: antlib

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If everything is defined as a component at a low level, then they > can be easily introspected to find out what interfaces components > implement. This breaks down if there is no specific interface for a role - like task or data

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19213] - Further Cleanup of the ClasspathUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18476] - copy with filtering modifies lineendings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: antlib

One comment about roles: Roles are fine, but roles are just strings... If everything is defined as a component at a low level, then they can be easily introspected to find out what interfaces components implement. For example, why would I have to say: when class a.b.C does implement FileSelector

Re: Cleanup for ClasspathUtils

On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. ClasspathUtils duplicates (i.e. stole) some code from the > o.a.t.a.taskdefs.Definer: the least I should do is refactor that one > to now use what is in the ClasspathUtils. This is now in CVS. I noted at least one difference, and

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters HeadTailTest.java

umagesh 2003/04/23 08:12:13 Modified:src/etc/testcases/filters head-tail.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/filters StripJavaComments.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters HeadTailTest.java Log: Enable previously disabled head-tail tests. Make

cvs commit: ant build.xml

umagesh 2003/04/23 08:11:43 Modified:.build.xml Log: Enable previously disabled head-tail tests. Make StripJavaComments recognize and retain Mac line endings. PR: 18476 Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter reilly) Revision ChangesPath 1.369 +0 -1

Re: antlib

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not even sure the code today was examining the value. 8-) It's been a long time, I know. > we probably should define more meaningful attributes > > ant-required-version, antlib-version (version used to buils >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19213] - Further Cleanup of the ClasspathUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ClasspathUtils.java

bodewig 2003/04/23 08:03:06 Modified:src/etc/testcases/core/loaderref loaderref.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Definer.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ClasspathUtils.java Log: Make Definer use the new ClasspathUtils, make ClasspathUti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19151] - A New nested element to the batchtest element of the JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19247] - zipfileset: 'src' does not replace 'dir' attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19113] - XMLJUnitResultFormatter fails to detect embedded CDATA sections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19213] - Further Cleanup of the ClasspathUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] New: - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19213] - Further Cleanup of the ClasspathUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19247] New: - zipfileset: 'src' does not replace 'dir' attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: antlib

Hi Stefan, > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > looks like that > > > > Is that the version of the antlib parser, i.e. does version define the > format of the file? The minimal version of Ant the antlib needs? Or > is that the version of the antlib itself? I think we'll hav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13510] - CvsChangeLog should accept a branch as an optional parameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: antlib

> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > At the low level - i.e. all are components, we just create and define > the components. > > If they are used in one role or another - or how the role is > associated > ( patterns like "has an execute() method" or interfaces ) - it really

Re: antlib

Dominique, can you publish the source code of your proposal ? BTW, in the proposal under proposal/sandbox/antlib, there is some provision to add other roles than task or datatype, by adding under the root of the descriptor something like then you can have elements starting

Re: Backward incompatible change in task?

I am aware of the problem, sorry :( I did changes in the zipfileset datatype which are causing your trouble. I will fix that. Antoine - Original Message - From: "Gianugo Rabellino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 12:11 AM Subject: Backward incompa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19151] - A New nested element to the batchtest element of the JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19150] - Command-line argument "jvmarg" attribute "file" not working.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19150] - Command-line argument "jvmarg" attribute "file" not working.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19150] - Command-line argument "jvmarg" attribute "file" not working.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19150] - Command-line argument "jvmarg" attribute "file" not working.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

js.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-20030423.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-bsf-20030423.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-classpath-20030423.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-commands-20030423.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-core-20030423.jar:/home

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19213] - Further Cleanup of the ClasspathUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19187] - ReplaceRegExp cannot handle multi-byte encodings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19180] - enhancement to mail / email smtp task to support smtp over tls/ssl

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19179] - enhancement to mail / email task to support smtp auth

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19150] - Command-line argument "jvmarg" attribute "file" not working.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19113] - XMLJUnitResultFormatter fails to detect embedded CDATA sections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19184] - [Patch] Cvs tasks require cvs.exe not documented

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the trouble, No trouble, just observations 8-) Stefan

Re: antlib

- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 8:49 AM > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > 1) antlib & antjar > > > > > > deployment descriptor cal

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java

Sorry for the trouble, I will fix it. Antoine - Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 8:24 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java > On 22 Apr 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9302] - SwingRunner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9302] - SwingRunner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9303] - Supoprt Nested ServiceKernel

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9304] - Service Deployment/Descriptors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9303] - Supoprt Nested ServiceKernel

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9304] - Service Deployment/Descriptors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9536] - Write a Diff Task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9301] - Merge Old Project/Workspace model and Module/TargetMetaData code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9301] - Merge Old Project/Workspace model and Module/TargetMetaData code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9300] - Support raw Classsaths in TypeDef

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Fwd: Re: antlib]

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 22/04/2003 19.20: Hi guys, I would propose to that instead of calling ruper, the rupper people can provide a task (or whatever other name you want) that will do all the finding and downloading and then will invoque . If we do this, then we can concentrate here on

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java

antoine 2003/04/23 00:20:17 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java Log: fix ZipFileSet#getRef for referenced ZipFileSets Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +5 -7 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ZipFileSet.java Index: ZipFileSet.java =

Re: antlib

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) antlib & antjar > > > deployment descriptor called antlib.xml which would go in the > META-INF subdirectory of the antlib I prefer an XML descriptor over manifest entries as well, because it is eas

Re: antlib

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we do this, then we can concentrate here on the local > while someone else can take care of the external work. +1 Stefan

Re: antlib

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 22/04/2003 19.20: Hi guys, I would propose to that instead of calling ruper, the rupper people can provide a task (or whatever other name you want) that will do all the finding and downloading and then will invoque . If we do this, then we can concentrate here on

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors ContainsRegexpTest.java

bodewig 2003/04/22 23:34:53 Modified:.build.xml src/etc/testcases/types selectors.xml Added: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors ContainsRegexpTest.java Log: Add testcase for containsregexp selector. Submitted

Re: [PATCH] add test case for containsregexp

I'm taking care of it. Stefan

ZipFileSet test failures in CVS HEAD

[junit] Testcase: testAttributes(org.apache.tools.ant.types.ZipFileSetTest):Caused an ERROR [junit] null [junit] java.lang.NullPointerException [junit] at org.apache.tools.ant.types.ZipFileSetTest.testAttributes(ZipFileSetTest.java:149) [junit] at java.lang.re

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java

On 22 Apr 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +if (o instanceof FileSet) { > + return (AbstractFileSet)(new ZipFileSet((FileSet)o)); the cast is not needed here. > +} > +else if (!(o instanceof ZipFileSet)) { will always be true as instanceof ZipFileSet

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Which documentation? > I meant the ant manual page under docs/manual/CoreTasks/war.html > Nested elements lib > > The nested lib element specifies a FileSet. Well, yes. This does

Re: ERROR: unknown key letter (cm1)

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Nafis Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone has solution/cause for following error. I don't use pvcs, so I have no idea, sorry. It is not really an Ant problem as what you see has been written by pvcs itself. You may get better responses if you ask on the user list, as

[PATCH] add test case for containsregexp

Here is the test case for the containsregexp I submitted last week. Thanks. --- selectors.xml 2003-04-21 00:31:42.0 -0500 +++ /cdrive/apache-ant-1.6alpha/src/etc/testcases/types/selectors.xml 2003-04-22 20:01:18.0 -0500 @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ + + @@ -81,5 +85,27 @@

Re: antlib

Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Regarding AntLib itself, XML descriptor or not, I'm more interested >> in being able to partition the namespace used by Ant to perform the >> name to class mapping currently restricted to tasks/types. > > Let's start with tasks and types and see if/how that flies. > > If