Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread J.Pietschmann
Costin Manolache wrote: There are working and valid systems ( Axis, Xslt ) that use the namespace with associated meaning. The expanded XML element/attribute names get a meaning through an processing model, nobody denies this. The problems start if someone associates a specific semantic with the f

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/antlib build.xml

2003-04-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/04/28 14:44:34 Modified:proposal/sandbox/antlib build.xml Log: added a basic install-lite target Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +7 -0 ant/proposal/sandbox/antlib/build.xml Index: build.xml ==

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/antlib/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

2003-04-28 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/04/28 14:40:51 Modified:proposal/sandbox/antlib/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java Log: brought in sync with main branch Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +315 -117 ant/proposal/sandbox/antlib/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread Costin Manolache
J.Pietschmann wrote: > peter reilly wrote: >> True. It seems quite difficult to use namespaces in a nice way. > > You are not supposed to "use namespaces in a nice way". That's a matter of taste. Some people like "nice way", some people like UUIDs. There is nothing in the namespace definition th

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Costin Manolache
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Assume class C implements role intrefaces P, Q, and R then > > > > > will cause two definitions for "P" and "Q" each. There is no way to > assign different names separately. On the other approach: > > > > > > > > here you can get different names for diffe

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread J.Pietschmann
peter reilly wrote: True. It seems quite difficult to use namespaces in a nice way. You are not supposed to "use namespaces in a nice way". XML Namespaces are there so that you can avoid name clashes for XML element and attribute names if you want to use XML vocabularies from various uncoordinated

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My comments in-line: > > On Monday 28 April 2003 16:35, Costin Manolache wrote: > > To keep things simple and make it easier to get an agreement - > > let's let adapters out, and focus on the core issue. > > > > IMO it seems what everything leads

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To keep things simple and make it easier to get an agreement - > let's let adapters out, and focus on the core issue. > > IMO it seems what everything leads to is the need to extend > the introspection patterns with another case. Let's agree

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 28 April 2003 18:40, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > > > > yes > no > > > > This particular example does not get through the rules, If extends ConditionBase, but does not exte

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
peter reilly wrote, On 28/04/2003 19.53: On Monday 28 April 2003 18:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: peter reilly wrote, On 28/04/2003 19.37: On Sunday 27 April 2003 22:14, Wannheden, Knut wrote: ... but maybe the buildfile author wants/needs to specify the namespace URI (anything really), in which c

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 28 April 2003 18:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > peter reilly wrote, On 28/04/2003 19.37: > > On Sunday 27 April 2003 22:14, Wannheden, Knut wrote: > > ... > > >>but maybe the buildfile author wants/needs to specify the namespace URI > >>(anything really), in which case an additional "ns"

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
peter reilly wrote, On 28/04/2003 19.37: On Sunday 27 April 2003 22:14, Wannheden, Knut wrote: ... but maybe the buildfile author wants/needs to specify the namespace URI (anything really), in which case an additional "ns" attribute could be used: This is fine. This is *v

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
My comments in-line: On Monday 28 April 2003 16:35, Costin Manolache wrote: > To keep things simple and make it easier to get an agreement - > let's let adapters out, and focus on the core issue. > > IMO it seems what everything leads to is the need to extend > the introspection patterns with anot

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > >> In any case, all you really need is the tag name and the > >> class name - the > >> roles will be available as interfaces or superclasses. > >> Nothing special for > >> this association. > >> > > > >

Re: NameSpace & antlib was (Re: polymorphism)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
On Sunday 27 April 2003 22:14, Wannheden, Knut wrote: > > Or even: > > > > That syntax abuses the purpose of XML Namespaces, IMO. Although a > namespace is identified by an URI, I don't think attaching semantics to it > is correct. I am no expert in xml ns usage (my only experiance with xml is

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/lib xjavadoc-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-apache-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-web-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xdoclet-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xjavadoc-uc-1.2b3-dev.jar

2003-04-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
Oops... sorry - I should have done this the other day. I had the JAR's in the right directory, just did not commit them. Erik On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 12:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jesse 2003/04/28 09:45:22 Modified:proposal/xdocs/lib xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar

cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/lib xjavadoc-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-apache-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-web-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xdoclet-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xjavadoc-uc-1.2b3-dev.jar

2003-04-28 Thread jesse
jesse 2003/04/28 09:45:22 Modified:proposal/xdocs/lib xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-apache-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-web-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xdoc

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 28 April 2003 17:28, peter reilly wrote: > An object of Cimpl gets method 3, An object of ABImpl is ambiguous and is > allowed. That should be "not" allowed Peter

Re: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread peter reilly
I would agree nearly 100% with Costin. Proposal: There will be only one mapping defined elementtag -> java class. Introspection Mapping - This class will be used if there is no add[Configured]() The introspection mapping should be extended to handle 4. public v

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5155] - New Oracle optional task ??

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/vss MSVSS.java MSVSSADD.java MSVSSCHECKIN.java MSVSSCHECKOUT.java MSVSSCP.java MSVSSCREATE.java MSVSSGET.java MSVSSHISTORY.java MSVSSLABEL.java

2003-04-28 Thread jesse
jesse 2003/04/28 08:46:03 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/vss MSVSS.java MSVSSADD.java MSVSSCHECKIN.java MSVSSCHECKOUT.java MSVSSCP.java MSVSSCREATE.java MSVSSGET.java MSVSSHISTORY.java MSV

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Costin Manolache
To keep things simple and make it easier to get an agreement - let's let adapters out, and focus on the core issue. IMO it seems what everything leads to is the need to extend the introspection patterns with another case. Let's agree on this pattern first. Assuming: If ParentClas

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Costin Manolache
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: >> You'll have a task TaskA, with a method "addRoleB". >> And in XML: >> >> >> >> >> >> TaskA doesn't know anything about the implementation - it >> will only use an >> interface ( or base class ) "RoleB" as parameter. >> >> >> I assume you will need

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19386] New: - condition evaluates to true when both files cannot be found

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19385] - BorlandEJBTask: Java2iiop may block the command.

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19385] - BorlandEJBTask: Java2iiop may block the command.

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19385] - BorlandEJBTask: Java2iiop may block the command.

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19385] New: - BorlandEJBTask: Java2iiop may block the command.

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Roles (was: antlib)

2003-04-28 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > What does it all mean? It means we can now write a task, > well typed, which > > can be accept different XML subelements depending on the > declarations of > > other objects present on the build. The vend

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 05:42:47 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java Log: Only tasks should be case-sensitive inside TaskContainers - simply the code a little. Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +10 -20

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19323] - user-defined sequential class requires lower case nested tasks

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant build.xml

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 05:22:29 Modified:.build.xml Log: Disabled the test by accident Revision ChangesPath 1.374 +0 -1 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/build.x

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19323] - user-defined sequential class requires lower case nested tasks

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper ProjectHelper2.java

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 05:19:18 Modified:.build.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper ProjectHelper2.java Log: Enable mixed-case task names inside t

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant TaskContainerTest.java

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 03:30:00 Modified:src/etc/testcases/core taskcontainer.xml src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant TaskContainerTest.java Log: Demonstrate bug 19323 Submitted by: Jim Scarborough Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +10 -0 ant/src/etc/test

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19323] - user-defined sequential class requires lower case nested tasks

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19284] - Jar files created by Ant 1.5.3 are not viewable by WinZip

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10499] - Compiler task doesn't handle spaces in filenames correctly

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10499] - Compiler task doesn't handle spaces in filenames correctly

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19285] - Invalid path when using javac with fork="true"

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14849] - JProbe tasks: executables cannot be found with JProbe 4.0.1

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/sitraka CovMerge.java

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 03:07:11 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/sitraka CovMerge.java Log: output file must be specified as argument for JProbe 4.x. PR: 14849 Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +3 -2 ant/src/main/org/apa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17040] - JUnit task report does not use the one defined by setName method

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Antlib descriptor

2003-04-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - we can restrict the set of elements under antlib to taskdef, > typdef or role ( after role is added to ant ), or we can allow more looks important as well. Stefan

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xjavadoc build.xml,1.49,1.50

2003-04-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
Sorry for the delay - was offline for the weekend... I didn't change the value of those properties, actually. I just changed 'value' to 'location' (sorry, its my picky Ant build file syntax checker in me :). But I see Stefan fixed up Gump. Thanks! Erik On Saturday, April 26, 2003, at 03

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
"Medium" reference? I compare that to Eriks and Steves book ... so most of them are "short" :-) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 28. April 2003 10:51 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] New resource found >

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + A German language short reference for Ant I've changed that as I feel 260+ pages and a CD is a little bit more than a "short reference" 8-) Stefan

cvs commit: ant/xdocs resources.xml

2003-04-28 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/04/28 01:50:03 Modified:docs resources.html xdocsresources.xml Log: New German language book on Ant. Submitted by: Jan Materne Revision ChangesPath 1.57 +51 -11ant/docs/resources.html Index: resources.html

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 28. April 2003 10:36 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] New resource found > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While creating the diff for resou

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While creating the diff for resources.xml the diff-tool did some > extraordinary stuff with the "Java Development with Ant" entry: + a > line and - the the same line ... confusing. whitespace differences, probably. diff -ub will avoid

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19350] - Lower and Upper case

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xjavadoc build.xml,1.49,1.50

2003-04-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What projects are you referring to? Projects that declare a dependency on xjavadoc in Gump will check in the old location as this is where Gump tells them to look for the jar. > Where do they specify the xjavadoc/build/lib folder?

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xjavadoc build.xml,1.49,1.50

2003-04-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 26 Apr 2003, Jesse Stockall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has broken the Gump runs for anything that depends on XJavadoc Which is in part Gump's failure, or so. Gump declares where the jars are in the descriptor, and if the location changes, the descriptor will need to be adapted. I'll t

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
Fine, it seems that my attachement didn´t come through ... So as inline: diff-file --8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8- <-8-<--- --- C:\seu\cvs-downloads\ant\ant\xdocs\resources.xml.org.fixcrlfMon Apr 28 06:08:46 2003 +++ C:\seu\cvs-downl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19379] - Project.setProperty(String,String) only works first time

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
Title: [PATCH] New resource found I found a new book about Ant. While creating the diff for resources.xml the diff-tool did some extraordinary stuff with the "Java Development with Ant" entry: + a line and - the the same line ... confusing. Here is the patchfile. But I couldn´t test the mod

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19379] - Project.setProperty(String,String) only works first time

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19379] New: - Project.setProperty(String,String) only works first time

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19350] - Lower and Upper case

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19343] - PropertyFile - property value wrapping option

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19343] - PropertyFile - property value wrapping option

2003-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu