conor 2003/07/09 20:32:34
Modified:.build.bat build.sh
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Launcher.java
src/script ant.bat
Log:
Make launcher work on Win2K
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +1 -1 ant/build.bat
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13417.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16463.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11429.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13417.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 9 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-clean one. For now, the ugly
-method is the most portable:-
+clean one. The ugly method is the only one that was available on Ant1.5
and
+earlier:
maybe you could also update the FAQ with the new information?
Thanks
Stefan
bodewig 2003/07/10 00:27:20
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks import.html
Log:
Don't think you can claim copyright for something that didn't exist.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/import.html
Index: import.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21414.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I have placed two new patches for the antlib proposal
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897
The first deals with the ant-type polymorphic feature
and the second deals with the antlib xml definition
feature.
The two patches are not related and may considered
independently.
Hi,
At our company we're developing Ada95 code for various platforms, including
OpenVMS. We've built our own development tools based on Ant for this. I
was wondering if someone in the Ant community had some useful tips or other
information on this topic to share. E.g. what tasks work / don't
Here is a small patch to add the javacc.jar to the search list for the
javacc task. This makes the task work with sane layouts such as
/usr/share/java/javacc.jar or lib/javacc.jar (eg for JPackage).
Please apply - tested with JavaCC 3.1.
Paul Nasrat
Index:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Knut Wannheden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At our company we're developing Ada95 code for various platforms,
including OpenVMS.
You are the first person reporting anything about Ant on OpenVMS
AFAIK.
I used to work with OpenVMS about seven to five years ago, but I've
never
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Paul Nasrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a small patch to add the javacc.jar to the search list for
the javacc task.
This is by far not enough, you'd get a major version from
getMajorVersionNumber of 4, which in turn would cause getMainClass to
fail.
This makes the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:04:52PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Paul Nasrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is by far not enough, you'd get a major version from
getMajorVersionNumber of 4, which in turn would cause getMainClass to
fail.
My bad. I really didn't look at the
conor 2003/07/10 04:29:39
Modified:.build.xml
src/script ant ant.bat
Log:
Remove warning about JAVA_HOME as it isn't required anymore
Revision ChangesPath
1.386 +36 -36ant/build.xml
Index: build.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9183.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:04:52PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Paul Nasrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a small patch to add the javacc.jar to the search list for
the javacc task.
Take two - I've actually tested this one rather than thinking I have :)
Apologies
conor 2003/07/10 04:49:08
Modified:src/script ant.bat
Log:
Use language neutral variable, %ProgramFiles%, to locate Program Files dir
PR: 17308
Submitted by: Dennis Müller
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +3 -3 ant/src/script/ant.bat
Index: ant.bat
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Knut Wannheden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The VM supports both VMS native file path syntax and a Unix style
filenames for most operations.
I see.
These limitations are imposed by the VM implementation. In summary
you can run .EXE images using Unix style filenames and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Stefan,
I think it should all be solvable inside Execute. You could
restrict users to only execute .EXE and .COM files on VMS. Another
solution is to write the command to a temporary .COM and then
execute that. But I have to do some more testing here.
In either case, we should add
Guys, if you're willing to introduce a JNI lib for VMS, all the operations
you wish to perform are available through VMS System Services, including
getting/setting the Logical Names, and, IIRC, launching a DCL interpreter
directly, avoiding the need for the DCL wrapper.
It's been a while (like
conor 2003/07/10 06:23:47
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
Describe new Launcher.
Revision ChangesPath
1.455 +16 -10ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21414.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21414.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21414.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Knut Wannheden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the other Runtime.exec() methods (without working directory)
should all work.
So let's really treat OpenVMS like OS/2 and disable the Jdk13Launcher
unconditionally.
There seem to be some other tasks which check the return value
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, if you're willing to introduce a JNI lib for VMS, all the
operations you wish to perform are available through VMS System
Services,
Sure - just like many useful Unix operations (like stat or setuid)
could be 8-)
At the moment it
At 10:45 AM 7/10/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, if you're willing to introduce a JNI lib for VMS, all the
operations you wish to perform are available through VMS System
Services,
Sure - just like many useful Unix operations (like stat or setuid)
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:45 AM 7/10/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, if you're willing to introduce a JNI lib for VMS, all the
operations you wish to perform are available through VMS System
Services,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On the 8 argument limitation, you could pass *all* the arguments in a
single DCL argument, then have the wrapper parse them (DCL has some
reasonable tokenizing functions IIRC)
I don't recall any restriction on the size of DCL script arguments, but it
will documented be in the DCL manual.
At
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yeah, I about mass-deleted my ant emails today since I've been on
vacation, good thing this subject name for some reason caught my
attention. Let me ponder it and get back to you shortly.
Jeff Tulley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(801)861-5322
Novell, Inc., The Leading Provider of Net Business Solutions
But the other Runtime.exec() methods (without working directory)
should all work.
So let's really treat OpenVMS like OS/2 and disable the Jdk13Launcher
unconditionally.
The Java CommandLauncher for VMS could catch the IOException with the
message function not implemented and tell the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:29:07PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Ugh. Replying to my own post.
So, the 5 parameter version was in 2.2; and the line, column, and
source info were *utterly* unused in that version.
I put them in .. as a start towards making BSF scripts debuggable
in a
Connor,
It looks like indeed this will change the behavior a little bit,
though if it has any adverse effect remains to be seen. Previously
NetWare would have been completely excluded from that if statement, but
since NetWare's pathSeparatorChar is indeed ;, this block could
conceivably run on
Hello! It is some months I use Ant to build J2EE applications; I've noted
that the Ant community is adding and adding tasks to Ant; this is good
beacuse Ant have new features.
But for newcomers it is hard to to master this great number of tasks; they
are really panicked the first times they read
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21438.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- The Ant exec task throws a BuildException if the exit code
is unequal zero.
Do you know how to get around that? Should the Execute class, in
the case of VMS, map the exit status to what's common on Unix
systems?
Maybe we should provide a Execute.isFailure(int result) method that
returns
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21438.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21481.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
51 matches
Mail list logo