DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - [PATCH] macrodef child elements should use their description attributes in error messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24711] - macrodef elements should support a description attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java

antoine 2004/01/28 15:26:08 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH cvsversion.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH CvsVersion.java Log: Merge from HEAD problem of line ending Revision Changes

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java

antoine 2004/01/28 15:24:52 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks cvsversion.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java Log: got hit by a line ending problem, now this will be the right format Revision ChangesPath 1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] New: - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13510] - CvsChangeLog should accept a branch as an optional parameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

antoine 2004/01/28 15:15:45 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ChangeLogTask.java docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH changelog.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java

antoine 2004/01/28 14:51:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib CvsVersion.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java Log: added @since tags Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -0 ant/src/

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

antoine 2004/01/28 14:47:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/cvslib ChangeLogTask.java docs/manual/CoreTasks changelog.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java defaults.pr

FW: FW: ant pvcs optional task

Anyone extend the PVCS task to check IN files in addition to checking them out? Thanks, Scott Anderson -Original Message- From: Thomas Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:02 PM To: Scott Anderson Subject: Re: FW: ant pvcs optional task Hi Scott T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26384] - enhance CONCAT to allow property resolution within the body

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Well, that can surely break BC Peter if one used to cast a TaskDef into a > >Definer, no? Sure, it's not sensible code, but it's not 100% BC. All the > >old methods might still be there, so it's only 99.999% BC, which is fine > >by me ;-) I'm just n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25801] - filelist used in selector example with task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: "Unknown source" in stack trace

Steve Kelem wrote: I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and having the problem of getting "Unknown Source" in the stack trace. I've compiled (in ant) with debug="true", debuglevel="lines,vars,source", and even tried including the source tree in the jar file. By the way, the code I'm tr

Re: "Unknown source" in stack trace

Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't work. The stack trace for that ant task still shows: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.io.File.(File.java:180) at de.pleumann.antenna.WtkMakePrc.executeWtk(Unknown Source) at de.pleumann.antenna.WtkMakePrc.execute(Unknown Source)

Re: "Unknown source" in stack trace

--- Steve Kelem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and > having the problem of getting "Unknown Source" > in the stack trace. > I've compiled (in ant) with debug="true", > debuglevel="lines,vars,source", Sorry, Steve... I meant to respond to this the othe

"Unknown source" in stack trace

I'm trying to debug someone else's Ant Task code and having the problem of getting "Unknown Source" in the stack trace. I've compiled (in ant) with debug="true", debuglevel="lines,vars,source", and even tried including the source tree in the jar file. By the way, the code I'm trying to debug is an

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

Peter Reilly wrote: Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class should not be a problem. I have done this with Task

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

jhm 2004/01/28 07:08:27 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html Log: 2004 Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +1 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html Index: selectors.html === RCS fi

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

jhm 2004/01/28 07:13:40 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH selectors.html Log: Sync with HEAD. Bug 25801 + 2004 :-) Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.15.2.4 +7 -9 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/selec

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? Yes and no - but not too bad, I'd say. If you replace methods in ChangeLogTask with methods fro

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit > from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? Yes and no - but not too bad, I'd say. If you replace methods in ChangeLogTask with methods from AbstractCvsTask, clas

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new sup

RE: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > > Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from > > AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? > > I do not think so. > It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class > should n

RE: text support for macrodef

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >attributes like 'trim', 'optional', or why not 'normalize', etc... --DD > > > Ok done "trim" and "optional". What would "normalize" do ? Thanks Peter. I was just throwing 'normalize' out there. I'm no XML guru, but I thought there was special optio

RE: What about a per directory javac compiler

> From: Ernst de Haan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:30 AM > To: Ant Developers List; Antony Paul > Subject: Re: What about a per directory javac compiler > > Wouldn't it be a solution to copy all the files that should be in one > package to a single directory (e.g

Adding branch option to cvschangelog

Hi, I am working on adding the branch option to the task cvschangelog. (Bug report with 10 votes) I also plan to make a new task CvsVersion which will be able to set properties with the cvs client version and the cvs server version. In order for the ChangeLogTask to be able to delegate to the C

Re: BeanShellDef - java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition: AList

Michael Sunde wrote: Hi, Can't wait to see beanshelldef or something equivalent in a new version of ant. How about this for a task name: - inlinetypedef - scripttypedef All are good, scripttypedef may however get confused with scriptdef. reflectdef was meant to mean that java reflection was goi

Re: Adding branch option to cvschangelog

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Does it break *BC* if I change the ChangeLogTask class to inherit from AbstractCvsTask instead of Task ? I do not think so. It is allowed to add new methods to a class, so adding a new super class should not be a problem. I have done this with TaskDef. In 1.6 it inheri

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

jhm 2004/01/28 07:04:16 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html Log: Bug 25801: had written filelist instead of fileset. Thanks to Jim Fuller Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +6 -7 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html Index: selectors.html

Re: text support for macrodef

Dominique Devienne wrote: How about: ... ??? Makes it an nested element of , which allows to have interesting attributes like 'trim', 'optional', or why not 'normalize', etc... --DD Ok done "trim" and "optional". What would "normalize" do ? Peter --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] New: - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: What about a per directory javac compiler

Wouldn't it be a solution to copy all the files that should be in one package to a single directory (e.g. build/src/java/) and then do the regular operations on that directory? Ernst On woensdag 28 januari 2004 07:00, Antony Paul wrote: > Hi all, > I need to compile files which are in diffe

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util JavaEnvUtils.java

bodewig 2004/01/28 02:33:24 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH javac.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Javac.java src/main/org/apache/tool

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

bodewig 2004/01/28 02:01:20 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Document Java 1.5 support Revision ChangesPath 1.531 +5 -1 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26448] New: - NoSuchMethodError when using xml formatter in junit tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

What about a per directory javac compiler

Hi all, I need to compile files which are in different subdirectories but in same package. The particular javac task is to be used to compile the generated jsp files by a modified version of jspc task which puts all classes in org.apache.jsp package. This is a bug with Tomcat 4.1 implementation

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26484] New: - ColumnSeparator in SQLExec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Include the Apache 2.0 License in ant 1.6.1

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:39 am, Gus Heck wrote: > If it doesn't go in 1.6.1 won't we be forced to do a 1.6.2 or 1.6.1p1 or > something to update the licenses by March 1? Not quite. The next release after March 1 would need the updated licence. I don't think we'd be required to do a release purely

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26459] - SQL task (SQLExec class) might not see a ROW delimiter correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu