DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29376] New: - Similar to bug 25668 - ant ftp will not list or get files from HPUX

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Nested property expansion shouldn't occur but does

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Nested property expansion shouldn't occur but does

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Nested property expansion shouldn't occur but does

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Nested property expansion shouldn't occur but does

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29374] New: - Adding ant build script validation support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

What I was worried about were setPropertyHook() and getPropertyHook()... Maybe the java.text.Format comparison only applies to the parsePropertyString() implementation of a given PropertyHelper. So one PropertyHelper might use something like it, but another--such as the default one--would not. B

Recursive Property Expansion Patch

To aid discussion, here is a patch to make property expansion recursive. Notes: * I rejustified PropertyHelper.java in NetBeans so the diff looks more monstrous than it really is. * PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() is substituted replaceProperties o For BC this should

RE: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I think you're basically right. And I remember having > wondered why java.text.Format was implemented that > way; now I know... > > > Such strategy would allow writing property > > evaluators that contain real > > complex expressions insi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29371] New: - patch.xml chokes on "${" in method comment block

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

--- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > I guess, the way to do it properly is to use > something like the way > java.text.Format > works. You find the beginning of a property > reference and the > PropertyHelper chain is the one that tells you where > is the end pf the > prop

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > From: Jack J. Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Well, it seem to me the problem is deeper. You're correct ... I've got recursive expansion kinda working already, just fixing a bug now but have to put it aside to do some real work :-) > So what needs to be

RE: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

> From: Jack J. Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > We could create a new property > > ant.PropertyHelper.classname or some such, to allow > > users a comfortable way to avoid the situation above, > > but AFAICT the issue still exists. > > Well, some of what you are tal

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

Matt Benson wrote: > We could create a new property > ant.PropertyHelper.classname or some such, to allow > users a comfortable way to avoid the situation above, > but AFAICT the issue still exists. Well, some of what you are talking about is a little deeper in Ant-fu than I care to go for this p

Generic tasks/types WAS Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /> > The above reminds me of something... for one thing, that should have been a in that context, but anyway... what would be the ramifications of having ... and Et cetera? -Matt __

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: [SNIP] > > Agree in principle. As a matter of fact, we > already have the > > PropertyHelper chain framework. > > That's what I've been talking about, yes 8-) > Nice... howev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29362] - java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ide/VAJExport, method: getWorkspaceScanner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29362] New: - java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ide/VAJExport, method: getWorkspaceScanner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do not think that this is a bug. I'm not convinced either. I'd only want to reinstate 1.6.x's behavior if it really had changed in CVS HEAD (which I doubt, BTW). Ah, I see. Just tested with ant 1.5.4 and t

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not think that this is a bug. I'm not convinced either. I'd only want to reinstate 1.6.x's behavior if it really had changed in CVS HEAD (which I doubt, BTW). It probably has always (since 1.4 or so) worked the way it does now

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27541] - JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > Okay. I'm going to add one class >> > ..ant.util.RecursivePropertyParser and call it from >> > ..ant.PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() >> >> I'd rather make

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27541] - JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Okay. I'm going to add one class ..ant.util.RecursivePropertyParser > > and call it from ..ant.PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() > > I'd rather make that a completely new PropertyHelper that can > be selected on the command line

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29347] - Nested property expansion shouldn't occur but does

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ant should behave analagously to m4: recursively expand until > it either hits ground or an uninstantiated ${decorated} name. And potentially break existing build files. You can always write a PropertyHelper implementation

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27541] - JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my opinion, the problem reported is a bug, even if for instance JDK 1.4 regexp has a similar bug. I would go for fixing the bug without BC, in order not to make the code too complicated. Where "fi

cvs commit: ant CONTRIBUTORS

bodewig 2004/06/03 01:10:17 Added: .Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH CONTRIBUTORS Log: Removing and re-adding as binary Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.13 +0 -0 ant/CONTRIBUTORS

cvs commit: ant CONTRIBUTORS

bodewig 2004/06/03 01:09:46 Removed: .Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH CONTRIBUTORS Log: Removing and re-adding as binary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: ant CONTRIBUTORS

bodewig 2004/06/03 01:08:11 Added: .CONTRIBUTORS Log: Removing and re-adding as binary Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +0 -0 ant/CONTRIBUTORS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

cvs commit: ant CONTRIBUTORS

bodewig 2004/06/03 01:07:45 Removed: .CONTRIBUTORS Log: Removing and re-adding as binary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: commit emails

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible that the sending of commit emails is perturbated ? or > is my contributor email antoine at apache dot org currently blocked > on the distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Your commit mails have never entered the

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional xmlvalidate.xml

On 2 Jun 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Aslak Hellesøy > +Aslak Helles?y What OS are you running Antoine? We may need to commit the file as binary to ensure we don't break people's named (and settle on a common encoding). Stefan

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay. I'm going to add one class ..ant.util.RecursivePropertyParser > and call it from ..ant.PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() I'd rather make that a completely new PropertyHelper that can be selected on the command line

Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion.

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my opinion, the problem reported is a bug, even if for instance > JDK 1.4 regexp has a similar bug. I would go for fixing the bug > without BC, in order not to make the code too complicated. Where "fixing the" bug would ex

RE: commit emails

> The first time a contributor commits to a repository, the moderator > of that cvs@ list must approve and allow that poster. It's sort of > a PITA, but better than large volumes of @apache.org faked spam. I had bet that antoine had already done a commit ;-) Jan > > Bill > > At 03:38 PM 6/2/

Re: commit emails

The first time a contributor commits to a repository, the moderator of that cvs@ list must approve and allow that poster. It's sort of a PITA, but better than large volumes of @apache.org faked spam. Bill At 03:38 PM 6/2/2004, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: >Hi, > >Is it possible that the sending o

commit emails

Hi, Is it possible that the sending of commit emails is perturbated ? or is my contributor email antoine at apache dot org currently blocked on the distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? I just did a commit and did not see the commit email come back. Cheers, Antoine ---

Proposal to contribute the External Image Tasks to ANT 1.7

Hello, I developed and maintain the external Image task available at http://www.mullassery.com/software/ANT/. It is currently listed as one of the external tasks and is distributed under the Apache License. I would like to contribute it to the Image task in ANT 1.7, since I see no point in maint

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27541] - JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu