DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28703.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28703.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30525.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30524.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This probably isn't the right list for this, but I'm excided to
announce the alpha release of a new Ant add-on project called
Antlion over at SourceForge (antlion.sf.net), released under the
Apache license.
The reason why I'm posting here is because I thought people might be
interested in what
If we should add a link on http://ant.apache.org/projects.html, give us
a hint and the right infos :-)
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Groboclown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am: Montag, 9. August 2004 10:26
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [Announcement] New ant add-on
/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/antlr-2.7.3/antlr.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/net/dist/commons-net-20040809.jar
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant/gump_work/build_ant_test-a
nt.txt
Testcase: testCompilerAttribute(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicTest):
FAILED
default value
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: default value
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
at
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gump Integration Build wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran wrote:
we are back to CSC failing:
[junit] Testcase:
testCSC(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.DotnetTest): Caused an
ERROR
[junit] csc returned: 129
[junit]
/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/dotnet.xml:155:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30548.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Recently a poster had a problem with apply, because the executable it
was calling didn't create the destination directories, and apply would
not do it either. The poster used a very clever solution by doing the
apply in place (no dest attribute), and then use move to move all
the files to the
16 matches
Mail list logo