Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You mean that the MD5 and SHA-1 digests computed by the JDK-provided libraries didn't generate the canonical values of these digests? No, broken as

cvs commit: ant build.xml

2005-02-16 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2005/02/16 09:40:07 Modified:.build.xml Log: Disable clone test until we know why it fails on Linux. Revision ChangesPath 1.454 +2 -1 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS f

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Peter Reilly
I get: Buildfile: /home/preilly/learning/a/antbug/clone/build.xml [script] [{filenameselector name: foo negate: true casesensitive: true}] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Peter Matt Benson wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I get a "BUILD SUCESSFUL" Anyone care to try this one next?:

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get a "BUILD SUCESSFUL" Anyone care to try this one next?:

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You mean that the MD5 and SHA-1 digests computed by the JDK-provided > > libraries didn't generate the canonical values of these digests? > > No, broken as in "sucessfull

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
Thanks, I'll keep looking then. -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get a "BUILD SUCESSFUL" > > Peter > > Matt Benson wrote: > > >--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of > Gump > >>as well. > >> > >>

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Peter Reilly
I get a "BUILD SUCESSFUL" Peter Matt Benson wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of Gump as well. Hmm, can one or more of you Linux guys run this snippet for me? I do my Unix testing on Solaris and don't have a Linux box set up..

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of Gump > as well. Hmm, can one or more of you Linux guys run this snippet for me? I do my Unix testing on Solaris and don't have a Linux box set up... :( This is a quick test to make sure we're not loo

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean that the MD5 and SHA-1 digests computed by the JDK-provided > libraries didn't generate the canonical values of these digests? No, broken as in "sucessfully attacked". It is possible to create a file that matches the

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Modified: docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html > Log: choose your digest wisely > > +Note that many popular message digest functions - including MD5 and > +SHA-1 - have been broken recently. You mean that the MD5 and SHA-1 digests c

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/16 06:35:16 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH checksum.html Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.8.2.6 +14 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/checksum.html Index: checksum.ht

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/16 06:34:47 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html Log: 2005 Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/checksum.html Index: checksum.html === RCS file:

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/16 06:34:02 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html Log: choose your digest wisely Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +13 -0 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/checksum.html Index: checksum.html ==

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/svn/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/svn SvnTagDiffTest.java SvnRevisionDiffTest.java

2005-02-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/16 06:08:41 Modified:proposal/sandbox/svn/docs revisiondiff.html proposal/sandbox/svn/src/etc/testcases revisiondiff.xml proposal/sandbox/svn/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/svn SvnRevisionDiff.java antlib.xml

Re: Which algorithm to recommend for ?

2005-02-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's some mention of a hash called Whirlpool[1] that sounds like > it isn't based on the same bit hash as MD5 and SHA-0/1 The GNU JCE provider seems to have it[1]. > For ant 1.6.3, a mention that it's not safe to use checksum, At

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/svn/docs svn.html

2005-02-16 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/16 04:44:57 Modified:proposal/sandbox/svn/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/svn AbstractSvnTask.java proposal/sandbox/svn/docs svn.html Log: Add some more common attributes Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +105 -0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33604] - classconstants filter reader reads a limited number of constants per class.

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33604] - classconstants filter reader reads a limited number of constants per class.

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33604] New: - classconstants filter reader reads a limited number of constants per class.

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of Gump as well. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Which algorithm to recommend for ?

2005-02-16 Thread Kev Jackson
There's some mention of a hash called Whirlpool[1] that sounds like it isn't based on the same bit hash as MD5 and SHA-0/1 For ant 1.6.3, a mention that it's not safe to use checksum, but looking forward the cellautomaton hashes sound really cool - shame that they're way more CPU-cycle unfriend

AW: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Jan . Materne
Testcase: testClone2(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.CloneTest): Caused an ERROR expected ${ganger} = ""; instead was "/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/clon e.xml" /home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/clone .xml:27: expected ${

[GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-16 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20791] - [PATCH] add support to for popping up the JUnit GUI

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33583] - javac task ZipException - linux - java 1.5

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31885] - PATCH: Log JUnit TestListener events and unit test count

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31885] - PATCH: Log JUnit TestListener events and unit test count

2005-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Which algorithm to recommend for ?

2005-02-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, MD5 has been broken about half a year ago and now it seems as if SHA-1 was gone as well[1]. JDK 1.2 and 1.3[2] only list MD2 as alternatives while JDK 1.4 adds[3] SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512. MD2 doesn't look better than MD5 and the longer SHA variants aren't available on older JDKs.