cvs commit: ant/docs/manual using.html

mbenson 2005/02/28 15:52:48 Modified:docs/manual using.html Log: Java versions: Remove 1.1, add 1.5 . Revision ChangesPath 1.39 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/using.html Index: using.html === RCS f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33779] New: - NPEs when merging a manifest, when there is no file to merge into

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

a few questions (sorry quite long)

btw I have a few general developer questions... before I start caning bugzilla I think any responses would be well appreciated; a few comments on usage of XDoclet to autodoc manual as someone who is a complete fan of XDoclet and av

a few questions

Steve Loughran wrote: James Fuller wrote: no, I have already gone through the input masking funits more about locking down...or giving the opportunity to lock down; e.g. secure class loading, working with digital certs, etc... to run ant secure you'd need to generate a JAR of everything in t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Execute. getProcEnvironment()

seeing the install notes for eclipse shows up what they think are troublespots with ant, one of them being that hangs: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26770 I think we ought to take a look at this code, and rework it some more. It is all built around executing external code

[Ant Wiki] New: Ant17/Planning

Date: 2005-02-28T07:25:53 Editor: SteveLoughran Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: Ant17/Planning URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning start of planning for ant1.7 New Page: = Ant 1.7 Planning Section = == Milestones == * Beta1 * Beta2 * RC1 * Release === Projects we depend

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

James Fuller wrote: no, I have already gone through the input masking funits more about locking down...or giving the opportunity to lock down; e.g. secure class loading, working with digital certs, etc... to run ant secure you'd need to generate a JAR of everything in the tasks and tasks.opt

[Ant Wiki] Updated: Proposals

Date: 2005-02-28T06:51:41 Editor: SteveLoughran Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: Proposals URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Proposals no comment Change Log: -- @@ -5,3 +5,5 @@ * Being able to view the manual for p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33771] - Default username and password for ftp task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33771] New: - Default username and password for ftp task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33770] New: - Unable to retrieve file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32455] - JavaCC task should prefer newer versions of JavaCC

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32200] - CBZip2InputStream and CBZip2OutputStream produce strange exceptions when there's no data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Massively OT, 'Closures in Java' [was Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)]

If you want to iterate through a List that has an unspecified implementation (at the point of iteration) always use an iterator; this is the only way to implement performant code without making assumptions about the implementation of the list. Phil :n. On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:30, Jose Alberto Fe

RE: Massively OT, 'Closures in Java' [was Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)]

I do not think so, from LinkedList implementation: /** * Return the indexed entry. */ private Entry entry(int index) { if (index < 0 || index >= size) throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Index: "+index+ ", Size:

Re: Massively OT, 'Closures in Java' [was Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)]

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: AFAIU, LinkedList.get(N) requires traversing the list to position N on every call [O(n^2)], so usage of an iteratoe is much cheaper on this case as there is no array behind the scenes. Jose Alberto I've just worked out why it's ok to do it this way (with respect t

[GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

RE: Massively OT, 'Closures in Java' [was Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)]

AFAIU, LinkedList.get(N) requires traversing the list to position N on every call [O(n^2)], so usage of an iteratoe is much cheaper on this case as there is no array behind the scenes. Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 February 20

Massively OT, 'Closures in Java' [was Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)]

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Just one comment on your ClosureUtils.map() method. Although this code may be very good for ArrayList, I think it will behave quite bad for LinkList arguments where the cost of List.get(i) is quite expensive. When I read this, I thought "Doh! you're right none-seque

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20128] - vssget command label problem

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)

Just one comment on your ClosureUtils.map() method. Although this code may be very good for ArrayList, I think it will behave quite bad for LinkList arguments where the cost of List.get(i) is quite expensive. Maybe you should provide for that if you want this as a general utility pattern. Jose A

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33718] - No Authentication possible by a given keyfile

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33718] - No Authentication possible by a given keyfile

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Patch] condition, minor style, removed extra lines, slight javadoc tweak

- unnecessary nesting (if/else with early return) - -> javadoc - extra lines removed Index: Http.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/Http.java,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r

Re: AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)

Why you use the for-loop instead of iterator? 1 iterator has to check underlying array bounds for every hasNext(), and every next(), checking is slow, and in this case unecessary 2 iterator call to hasNext() each time around the loop - again we can call size() once and cache the result, sinc

AW: [Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)

> - removed iterator code fromModifiedSelector Why you use the for-loop instead of iterator? > - lazier DigestAlgorithm.getValue (includes JUnit test) > - removed unncecessary nesting in EqualsComparator > // >// - Instantiate the interfaces - >// >Strin

[Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue (now with added source code -doh!)

- removed iterator code fromModifiedSelector - lazier DigestAlgorithm.getValue (includes JUnit test) - removed unncecessary nesting in EqualsComparator // // - Instantiate the interfaces - // String className = null; String pkg = "org.apache.tools.ant.types.s

[Patch] modifiedselector, style, remove unused code, slightly more lazy DigestAlgorithm.getValue

- removed iterator code fromModifiedSelector - lazier DigestAlgorithm.getValue (includes JUnit test) - removed unncecessary nesting in EqualsComparator // // - Instantiate the interfaces - // String className = null; String pkg = "org.apache.tools.ant.ty

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33764] New: - always fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu