Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

Steve Loughran wrote: On the subject of java1.5; who is using yet? http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=34983#176758 "I believe that when the author said "ANT generated EJB 2.X classes..." he really meant "APT generated...". We indeed used ant 1.7's apt task to run apt,

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

1. I wish jikes would move up to 1.5; my life is spent waiting for things to compile again. I've skipped Java 1.5 for various reasons: 1 - the 'enhanced for loop' is just crap 2 - I've not needed generics, I actually have no need for one of the major features of the language, maybe I could

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35619] - Please convert SplashTask to use NOT sun internal classes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: How to pipe output to input?

After reading the article, I see that it directly conflicts what I said below. Having no use for Windows junctions at present, however, I will not be (at this time) spending any time refuting my own past experiences. ;) -Matt --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Dominique Devien

RE: How to pipe output to input?

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > well, it'd be nice if we could get/set unix file > permissions; that is > > the most important thing to me, symlinks would be > good too. There are no > > real symlinks in NTFS, though hard li

RE: How to pipe output to input?

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > well, it'd be nice if we could get/set unix file permissions; that is > the most important thing to me, symlinks would be good too. There are no > real symlinks in NTFS, though hard links are allowed in the same > filesystem. What about NTFS 'junc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35619] New: - Please convert SplashTask to use NOT sun internal classes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

antlib'ed tasks and System.out/err

Hi, as I've already written I have a problem where output sent to System.out somehow doesn't reach the AntUnit task. So far I have ot tracked down to the following scenario. (1) We get a fireTaskStarted event for the AntUnit task, this attaches the current thread to the task. (2) This one is im

svn commit: r209304 - in /ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/trunk: docs/assertions.html src/etc/testcases/assert.xml src/testcases/org/apache/ant/antunit/AssertTest.java

Author: bodewig Date: Tue Jul 5 11:55:47 2005 New Revision: 209304 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=209304&view=rev Log: No classloader issue, just me being unable to read 'name of the data-type'. Modified: ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html ant/sandbox/antlibs/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35590] - Request: control source/target of javac through a property

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

Alexey Solofnenko wrote: On JavaOne SUN presented something similar for Java 7. The syntax is not finilized yet - there are problems - <> characters are used in Java generics. They thinking about using # character, but it does not look good. IBM's compiler does not support generics - it is 1.4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35607] New: - Ant Get task downloads unmodified files when useTimestamp=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35605] - Incorrect summary output during junit tests: Running

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35605] New: - Incorrect summary output during junit tests: Running

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu