DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36174] New: - Consider enabling java.net.useSystemProxies by default

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36171] - -noclasspath crashes ant if no system classpath is set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36171] - -noclasspath crashes ant if no system classpath is set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36171] New: - -noclasspath crashes ant if no system classpath is set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: starting and killing background exec or java task

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > Life would be simpler if I could exec something in > the background. Not > spawned, which is designed to outlive ant, just in > the background. > stopping ant would stop background stuff. output > would still go to the > logger. > > I would

Re: starting and killing background exec or java task

Would be handy. I'm assuming that the "name" could create a property of that name, set to the process ID for example. You can then just "kill" that process using this ID... Phil :n. On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 15:38 +0100, Steve Loughran wrote: > I'm just reviewing what major changes I am needing to do

starting and killing background exec or java task

I'm just reviewing what major changes I am needing to do to my (big) work project to simplify stuff. One troublespot is running functional tests against a running system, I need to (maybe) start a program, run tests against it and then stop the program if I started it (but not if it was alrea

cvs commit: ant fetch.xml

stevel 2005/08/12 07:25:09 Modified:.fetch.xml Log: documenting proxy setup Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +10 -1 ant/fetch.xml Index: fetch.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/fetch.xml,v

Re: AW: Manual + xdocs etc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested, but I need to get myself a new laptop to start really working on ant again. My hard disk is nearly dead :(, so I did not use my laptop since shortly after the Ant 1.6.5 release. Good luck :-) I think we should reorder the existing docs along the

RE: [VOTE] migrate to svn

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Committer: 13+6=19 > - > +1: 6 > +0: 1 > -1: 0 > no vote: 12 I thought I +1'd or at least +0'd, but maybe not. +1 one to SVN migration (do we have a choice ;-) +0 to migration any given

RE: AW: Manual + xdocs etc

> I think it would be possible to include the examples in the Ant source > too - this would make it even more clear what the code is trying to > accomplish and would hep to prevent refactorings etc that go against the > intended use of the code. > > My thought would be to include at the top of the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36156] - Linux - Build process fails OutOfMemoryError

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Subversion migration?

Henri Yandell wrote: Any further thoughts migration-wise? Did you get your stuff done Steve? I wouldnt hold things back for me; this is only some cleanup and tagging of stuff that isnt going to ship.. - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: programmatically creating and marshalling antfiles

Jack Woehr wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters, -what about overloaded set operatons? which one should the get return? -what about property assignments. Tasks get their setters with properties expanded. also there is the issue of add