RAT results for Ant 1.7.0RC1 release candidate

Hi, I have tried the RAT tool on our Ant 1.7.0RC1 distribution. RAT is raising questions about all these files which do not have the ASL header (see list below): The first 3 files should be recognized by RAT. I conclude from this report that we should add an ASL header to our generated document

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I am wondering about is : would we remove the Starteam tasks > from Ant 1.7.1 for instance ? or have them both in Ant 1.7.1 and in > the antlib ? Deprecate them for one release before removing them. Stefan

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

What I am wondering about is : would we remove the Starteam tasks from Ant 1.7.1 for instance ? or have them both in Ant 1.7.1 and in the antlib ? I'd think that there would need to be a changeover period where starteam was available in ant and as a separate antlib (say for 1.7.1), but also note

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

Hello Kevin and others, I have read manifestations of interest from two persons who contributed to these tasks so far. So finding 3 people might work for Starteam. What I am wondering about is : would we remove the Starteam tasks from Ant 1.7.1 for instance ? or have them both in Ant 1.7.1 and in

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

Hi Antoine (et al).. what would be the process to move the starteam code to become an antlib ? I think just adding the antlib xml, and changing the package name of the starteam code is strictly all that's necessary. The hard part is getting enough support to push it through the sandbox into a

svn commit: r471921 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/zip: UnrecognizedExtraField.java ZipEntry.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Nov 6 14:58:45 2006 New Revision: 471921 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471921 Log: trailing spaces Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/zip/UnrecognizedExtraField.java ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/zip/ZipEntry.java

svn commit: r471920 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/jsp/JspC.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Nov 6 14:57:27 2006 New Revision: 471920 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471920 Log: javadoc Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/jsp/JspC.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/o

svn commit: r471919 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JUnitTestRunner.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Nov 6 14:56:24 2006 New Revision: 471919 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471919 Log: javadoc Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JUnitTestRunner.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/

svn commit: r471918 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc: JJDoc.java JJTree.java JavaCC.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Nov 6 14:55:35 2006 New Revision: 471918 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471918 Log: checkstyle Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc/JJDoc.java ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40900] - javadoc tasks that worked on 1.6.5 fail on 1.7.0Beta3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40900] - javadoc tasks that worked on 1.6.5 fail on 1.7.0Beta3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r471909 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Nov 6 14:42:36 2006 New Revision: 471909 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471909 Log: Bugzilla 40900, docletpath attribute of javadoc ignored Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40912] - patternset include "unless" not behaving as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40912] New: - patternset include "unless" not behaving as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: propose oncomplete value for all Tasks...

On 11/6/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having a free afternoon today and spotting > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941 > > in bugzilla, I think it would be a good idea to follow up with the > sugge

Re: propose oncomplete value for all Tasks...

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having a free afternoon today and spotting > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941 > > in bugzilla, I think it would be a good idea to follow up with the > suggestion to add something like it to the tasks. +0 I onc

svn commit: r471839 - in /ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk: changes.xml doap_DotnetAntlib.rdf version.properties

Author: bodewig Date: Mon Nov 6 11:39:51 2006 New Revision: 471839 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471839 Log: bump version Modified: ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/changes.xml ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/doap_DotnetAntlib.rdf ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/version.properties Modifi

[ANN] Apache .NET Ant Library 1.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Apache .NET Ant Library combines tasks to support development for the .NET platform using Apache Ant. In addition to the well known tasks that were already part of Ant 1.6.5 this library provides tasks to run NAnt, NUnit or MSBuild from Ant. The

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan and others, > > what would be the process to move the starteam code to become an > antlib ? Add them to the sandbox, try to find three committers[1], call for a vote to promote it, release it like any other piece of ASF

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.7.0RC1

On 11/6/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Peter Reilly wrote : > > I have a fix for: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40900 > The bug means that javadoc#setdocletpath path is ignored. > (which is pretty serious) > Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/task

Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

Stefan and others, what would be the process to move the starteam code to become an antlib ? would we first move the starteam code to the antlibs sandbox, then through a graduation process to the antlibs proper ? Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:1

RE: Unit tests results with current head

While I am not a committer, I am basically the contributor who took over the StarTeam tasks as near as I can tell. I am also the main StarTeam code contributor for CruiseControl as well. I think pulling every Source Control specific tasks into anlibs is a great idea. Ant is getting pretty bloate

Re: propose oncomplete value for all Tasks...

On 11/6/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seems ok - with: 1) use setNewProperty() instead of setProperty() A must, as the thread clearly shows property immutability must be respected here. Also showed me I had chimed in ;-) On 11/6/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40908] - Updating ScriptRunner for bsf 2.4.0 plus some minor enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40908] - Updating ScriptRunner for bsf 2.4.0 plus some minor enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40908] New: - Updating ScriptRunner for bsf 2.4.0 plus some minor enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.7.0RC1

Hi, Peter Reilly wrote : > > I have a fix for: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40900 > The bug means that javadoc#setdocletpath path is ignored. > (which is pretty serious) > Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java > ==

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.7.0RC1

On 11/5/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: > On 11/5/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I hit the send button a bit too fast. >> >> I want to ask : >> >> OK to release these files as Ant 1.7.0RC1 on Sunday, November 12th, as >> An

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40900] - javadoc tasks that worked on 1.6.5 fail on 1.7.0Beta3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: propose oncomplete value for all Tasks...

Seems ok - with: 1) use setNewProperty() instead of setProperty() 2) add javadoc 3) add manual pages Peter On 11/6/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Having a free afternoon today and spotting http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941 in bugzilla, I think it would

propose oncomplete value for all Tasks...

Hi, Having a free afternoon today and spotting http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941 in bugzilla, I think it would be a good idea to follow up with the suggestion to add something like it to the tasks. I notice that it was reported 2 years ago, but it's fairly simple to add (a