svn commit: r490604 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ComponentHelper.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Wed Dec 27 15:48:39 2006 New Revision: 490604 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490604 Log: checkstyle: make method a little smaller Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ComponentHelper.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache

svn commit: r490602 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email/EmailTask.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Wed Dec 27 15:45:01 2006 New Revision: 490602 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490602 Log: checkstyle: make method a little smaller Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email/EmailTask.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/

svn commit: r490599 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Get.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Wed Dec 27 15:41:33 2006 New Revision: 490599 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490599 Log: checkstyle: make the execute method a litte smaller Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Get.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/or

svn commit: r490597 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Expand.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Wed Dec 27 15:37:38 2006 New Revision: 490597 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490597 Log: checkstyle:check off for public method Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Expand.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/t

RE: Branch

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe > > splitting the source tree per jar. +1 > > Why? > > Splitting the source tree by moving things to antlibs is > fine, but why split the source tree

svn commit: r490531 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/javac.html

Author: jhm Date: Wed Dec 27 08:31:07 2006 New Revision: 490531 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490531 Log: Describe as suggested in the Forum on http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1323111 Fix some xml-entity mistakes (missing ;) Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/Co

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

Re: Branch

On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH. fine with me. > For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting > the source tree per jar. Why? Splitting the source tree by moving things to

Re: AntUnit

On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so > definetely +1 here. OK, that have been +1s by plenty of people by now. I'll build release tarballs sometime latr this week/early next week so that we can vote on them a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

AW: Branch

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Dezember 2006 19:50 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: Branch > >Matt Benson wrote: >> --- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I also would prefer to