My problem with magic properties is that they pollute the namespace of
allowed property names. Since properties are immutable, it can be
confusing for someone to try to define a property for the first time in
their build file and have it come back with an error about redefinition.
Having said
take a look at the spec for 'qualified name'
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#dt-NSName
qualified name
is a name subject to namespace interpretation.
[Definition:
An XML namespace is identified by
a URI reference [RFC3986];
element and attribute names
may be placed in an XML namespace usi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, QNames are (a) evil (b) not part of XML; they ar part of the W3C XML
> Schema.
hehe, this was exactly the response I predicted.
ok, I will play along .
> I've just noticed the that Open Grid Forum's Open Grid Se
James Fuller wrote:
wouldn't it be great if property names were qnames and then we could do
ant:default-target
ant:targets-invoked
though I do not think the default namespace e.g.
antlib:org.apache.tools.ant is wholly appropriate as it concerns
itself with ant libraries.
I know ant doesn'
>> Since we're at it, we may also want to expose ant.current-target and
>> ant.invoked-target properties, but these are "dynamic" since
>> changing during the course of the build, so more problematic given
>> the property immutability rules.
>
> Just to make sure I understand what you are talking a
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd add that those properties, if made available, should probably be
> prefixed with ant., to make it clear they are "built-in". Perhaps:
>
> ant.default-target
> ant.targets-invoked
The actual patch uses ant.current.target and
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
>>
>> I'd add that those properties, if made available, should probably be
>> prefixed with ant., to make it clear they are "built-in". Perhaps:
>>
>> ant.default-target
>> ant.targets-invoked
>>
>
Le lundi 2 juin 2008, Scheper, Erik-Berndt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the current status of the planned IVYDE release is.
> Personally I think it would be nice if the suggested alpha release would be
> built on top of an an updated official IVY release (either as beta 3 or as
> rc1).
Hi,
I was wondering what the current status of the planned IVYDE release is.
Personally I think it would be nice if the suggested alpha release would be
built on top of an an updated official IVY release (either as beta 3 or as
rc1). Then we would have both in sync.
Any other comments, sug
Dominique Devienne wrote:
I'd add that those properties, if made available, should probably be
prefixed with ant., to make it clear they are "built-in". Perhaps:
ant.default-target
ant.targets-invoked
I'm +0 on adding these "static" properties.
Since we're at it, we may also want to expose ant
10 matches
Mail list logo
