On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose to adopt them as the AntUnit 1.1 release, please cast you
> votes, this vote will be open for a week.
+1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
+1 Peter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out
> for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and
> uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11
The task has been added in the 1.7 timeframe but I don't see it
documented anywhere (some of our tests use it).
Does anybody remember whether we didn't want people to know the task
is there (see ) or just forgot to document it?
Stefan
-
Hi all,
I've added a bunch of tests and I worked my way from Ant 1.7.1 to
trunk's HEAD by selective merging of the different changes.
Currently I don't think we'll get any closer to 1.7.1's memory usage
than we currently are (see below, the tests use the "big" setup of
dirscanner.xml).
I could p
>> > I think it would be better to write
>> > Message.info("\n\nIVYDE: Ivy-settings has changed,
configuring Ivy again\n");
>> > Or is "ivysettings" a technical term?
>>
>> well, in Ivy's literature, I used to read about some "ivyconf", so
with the
>> new terminology, it becames "ivysettings"
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > >> > if (ivySettingsLastModified == -1) {
> > >> > Message.info("\n\n");
> > >> > } else {
> > >> >
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> >> > if (ivySettingsLastModified == -1) {
> >> > Message.info("\n\n");
> >> > } else {
> >> > Message.info("\n\nIVYDE: ivysettings has changed,
> >>
> >> The info message completely
forget what I've written, getIncludedFiles and getIncludedDirectories
both have an Arrays.sort() in them, so sort order should be
predicatble and stable.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
>> > if (ivySettingsLastModified == -1) {
>> > Message.info("\n\n");
>> > } else {
>> > Message.info("\n\nIVYDE: ivysettings has changed,
>>
>>
>> The info message completely in lower case?
>
>is there any worry about it ?
Not really. But if
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> >Modified:
> >ant/ivy/ivyde/trunk/org.apache.ivyde.eclipse/src/java/org/apache/ivyde/
>
> eclipse/cpcontainer/IvyClasspathContainerConfiguration.java
>
> >@@ -480,14 +492,17 @@
> > }
> >
> > if (file.lastModified() != ivyS
>Modified:
>ant/ivy/ivyde/trunk/org.apache.ivyde.eclipse/src/java/org/apache/ivyde/
eclipse/cpcontainer/IvyClasspathContainerConfiguration.java
>@@ -480,14 +492,17 @@
> }
>
> if (file.lastModified() != ivySettingsLastModified) {
>-ivy = new Ivy();
>+IvySett
Hi all,
since no new issues have been found with the beta that has been out
for three weeks, I've created archives from the same code base and
uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit11/
I propose to adopt them as the AntUnit 1.1 release, please cast you
votes, this vote will be
As usual, I've not done any technical checks of the release archives,
I leave that to people more competetent than me.
>From the PMC member "everything looks legal" POV, here is my +1.
You may want to add the Apache License to
doc/samples/apache-hello-ivy-default.html
doc/style/tree.css
test/ja
Any objections about adding Ant to TeamCitys CI server?
If not I will contact them.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. September 2008 15:28
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: CI server
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM, <[
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilles Scokart wrote:
>> Couldn't it be optimized on windows by simply remove the check ?
>> Windows don't have symbolic link...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link#Windows
Not sure whether we'd detect them.
And then there may be a m
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>> At the same time memory usage has increased with 1.7.0 and never
>> decreased after that, in fact the current HEAD uses more memory
>> than ever before. Something between revisions 687768 and 693846
>> has bumped the memory ma
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Jackson wrote:
>
> > That's a huge difference - what are we doing now in 1.7.1 that is
> > different from before?
>
> I think it tries to sort stuff less.
>
> This broke hadoop builds as their class structure was wrong
> http
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The tests are not through yet, but one thing was so surprising to
>> me that I wanted to show it upfront:
>>
>> Running the matchall target (of sr/etc/performance/dirscanner.xml):
>>
>> Ant 1.6.5 1 min 30 s ~ 19 MB
Gilles Scokart wrote:
>
> Couldn't it be optimized on windows by simply remove the check ?
> Windows don't have symbolic link...
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link#Windows
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DirectoryScanner-performance-tp19549555p19567453.html
S
2008/9/19 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Interestingly the effect of followSymlinks=false is far less dramatic
> on Linux than on Windows.
>
Couldn't it be optimized on windows by simply remove the check ?
Windows don't have symbolic link... We could either have
followSymlinks being not
20 matches
Mail list logo
