On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
> Creating a 2.0.1 release is ok for me. I'm willing to create the release if
> no-one else volunteers...
>
> I've taken a quick look at the changes in JIRA, I think IVY-970 contains the
> biggest change, but I think we can include it in the
This change notification mail was completely useless.
It doesn't say what has changed and even if it did (link to ivyeclipse
was added) it had not included the URL, so you wouldn't know whether
it was linking to a legitimate site.
It doesn't even contain the URL of the page that has been changed,
On 2009-02-13, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
if (!f.getName().equals("package-info.java")) {
continue;
>> should that test better be case-insensitive?
> Should it? I don't know.
The rest of javac's uptodate checks is case-sensitive, so we may
be
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
