> this vote cancels and replaces the vote started on Friday. The vote of
> Friday is cancelled because of a
> bug affecting the junit task which would have suppressed the stack traces of
> failing tests.
>
> The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue.
>
> a candidate for an
On 2010-02-02, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> a candidate for ant 1.8.0 is available under
> http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0/
> Vote
> [X] Release as Apache Ant 1.8.0
> [] Do not release yet
+1
Stefan
On 2010-02-01, N C wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I'll revisit the remaining classes I have changed to ensure
>> they close the writers now if they didn't do so before.
> If you haven't, you might want to take a look at
> PlainJUnitResultFormatter. It isn't clear to me
Hi,
this vote cancels and replaces the vote started on Friday. The vote of
Friday is cancelled because of a
bug affecting the junit task which would have suppressed the stack
traces of failing tests.
The new build incorporates the fix for the junit stack traces issue.
a candidate for ant 1.
Thanks to you too again. We are redoing the next 1.8.0 RC because of
what you found :-).
Regards,
Antoine
N C wrote:
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
If you are setup to build/compile ant yourself, you can
update your working copy from svn and report whether the change fi
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> I'll revisit the remaining classes I have changed to ensure
> they close the writers now if they didn't do so before.
If you haven't, you might want to take a look at PlainJUnitResultFormatter. It
isn't clear to me that the BufferedWriter "wri" is
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> If you are setup to build/compile ant yourself, you can
> update your working copy from svn and report whether the change fixes
> the problem for you.
I've built from r905382. The problem is resolved in this build. Thanks.
-
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
"I don't get any stack traces in junit reports" may become an important issue
This is a serious regression. -1 on releasing 1.8.0 with this bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
F
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-01-30, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
a candidate for ant 1.8.0 is available under
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0/
The files look good and I'd give you my +1 for the release, but given
that nobody else has voted so far and the "I do
On 2010-01-30, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> a candidate for ant 1.8.0 is available under
> http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0/
The files look good and I'd give you my +1 for the release, but given
that nobody else has voted so far and the "I don't get any stack traces
in ju
On 2010-02-01, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'll revisit the remaining classes I have changed to ensure they close
> the writers now if they didn't do so before.
I've identified a few cases where the writer wouldn't get flushed or
closed in the error case - but things should be fine with the revision
11 matches
Mail list logo
