Hi Nicolas, thanks for the quick response. I would indeed be interested in the reason for having the project name in the classpath container configuration. I don't know any other classpath container that does that.
AFAICS, there is a single place where the project is read from the container path, and that is the second constructor of IvyClasspathContainerConfiguration: public IvyClasspathContainerConfiguration(IJavaProject javaProject, IPath path, boolean editing, IClasspathAttribute[] attributes) { this.javaProject = javaProject; IvyClasspathContainerConfAdapter.load(this, path, attributes); } So exactly before the project is read from the container via load(), the project is already set. Best wishes Carsten From: Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>, Date: 08.11.2012 23:01 Subject: Re: Some small patches for IvyDE Le 8 nov. 2012 à 22:32, carsten.pfeif...@gebit.de a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm evaluating the use of Ivy and IvyDE and found some small problems that > I would like to get addressed. > I already submitted Jira tickets with attachments to them, but I'm not > sure they will get any attention without > a default assignee. So that's why I'm here :-) There is no assignee so that there no particular committer which need to process them, any committer can be involved. And every committer is supposed to have subscribed to ant-notification mailing list, so everybody gets it. But not every committer knows about IvyDE internals or even features. But you did good coming here ping us since we are not particularly responsive :) > The issues are > 1) IVYDE-326 "Support for variables in the retrieve pattern" > 2) IVYDE-328 "Do not save the project name in the classpath container > configuration" > and (much less important) 3) IVYDE-327 "Problem when exporting the > eclipse-plugins (compiler target 1.2)" > > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. And thank you Carsten for your patches. They did get my attention. Particularly IVYDE-328 which I know I will refuse but I need to find again the reason why I did it. There was some messing up in the JDT, the source attachment and the Java launching. And I would need to document it so I won't have hard time remember why I did this :) I'll process then soon. cheers, Nicolas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org