Oops, had the nawk check inverted.
should have been
https://github.com/jwadamson/ant-1/commit/c1ac08abcaad0030064d62933dda278b5326f92b
Regards,
Jeff Adamson
From: Jeff Adamson/Cleveland/IBM@IBMUS
To: "Ant Developers List"
Cc: maarten_co...@yahoo.com
Date: 10/25/2016 02:40 PM
Subj
Probably helps if I include a link to the updated change
https://github.com/jwadamson/ant-1/commit/f3a0faecc464e899ec77cd7f2052b81a7c52be35
Please let me know if this resolves the problems with every crazy input you
can think of.
Regards,
Jeff Adamson
From: Jeff Adamson/Cleveland/IBM@IBMUS
Ok, hopefully this fixes it for Solaris without breaking mac or ubuntu
scenarios.
In sed mode script pads the argument with a \n. Experiments shows gnu sed
discards this character, so we don't need to strip it after processing, but
sed does preserve any explicit trailing newlines prior to last.
I
Also glad to know that awk is basically a no-go due to legacy versions.
Suppose we could use `which nawk` to use that if present?
So the trailing newline was a thing that I think was reported against an
earlier iteration. I see no reason we can't change the "padding" to be a "X
\n" value instead
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2016-10-18, Jeff Adamson wrote:
>>
>>> I made a new pull request based on the ongoing work.
>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/25
>>
>> Yes, thanks. I've merged it.
>>
>
I am out of the office until 28.10.2016.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Early Access
builds for JDK 8u122 b02 , JDK 9 & JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw b140 are
available on java.net" sent on 25.10.2016 11:25:59.
This is the only notification you will receive while this p
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2016-10-18, Jeff Adamson wrote:
>
>> I made a new pull request based on the ongoing work.
>
>> https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/25
>
> Yes, thanks. I've merged it.
>
>> What do you think and can we get some users to test behaviors on
Hi Stefan,
Sorry for the delay, I am traveling in China this week and being kept
very busy.
The issue you are seeing is JDK-8164908, fixed in jdk9/dev for jdk-9+142
or jdk-9+143.
Rgds,Rory
On 23/10/2016 21:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Rory,
I've tried "JDK9 with Project Jigsaw b140" but